Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Polanco v. Brooklyn Rose LLC
SC New York · Jun 16, 2026
NY / stateEditorial impact: lowfake citationsmisrepresented authoritytorttrial
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
In Polanco v. Brooklyn Rose LLC, the SC New York addressed a Fabricated: Case Law in a lawyer filing. The linked source records that defense papers cited this case but court could not locate the citation or match the caption. The recorded procedural consequence is Sanctions Hearing. The entry is dated 2026-06-16. It supports a focused account of the authority problem and does not establish an unrecorded AI tool, motive, or wider factual finding. The underlying source should be consulted for the complete filing and any later procedural developments.
- Why the court cared
- The linked source identifies the filing problem as: Defense papers cited this case but court could not locate the citation or match the caption..
- Why it matters now
- The source records a concrete authority-verification problem in a state proceeding and the tribunal’s documented response to it.
Why this matter is tracked
In Polanco v. Brooklyn Rose LLC, the SC New York addressed a Fabricated: Case Law in a lawyer filing. The linked source records that defense papers cited this case but court could not locate the citation or match the caption. The recorded procedural consequence is Sanctions Hearing. The entry is dated 2026-06-16. It supports a focused account of the authority problem and does not establish an unrecorded AI tool, motive, or wider factual finding. The underlying source should be consulted for the complete filing and any later procedural developments.
Operational lesson
The source records a concrete authority-verification problem in a state proceeding and the tribunal’s documented response to it.
Record details
New YorkSingle-state evidence scope
CourtSC New York
Jurisdictionstate
Circuit2nd Circuit
DateJun 16, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeSanctions Hearing
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Sanctions Hearing
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
23 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Defense papers cited this case but court could not locate the citation or match the caption.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Defense papers cited this case but court could not locate the citation or match the caption.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Defense papers cited this case but court could not locate the citation or match the caption.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Defense papers cited this case but court could not locate the citation or match the caption.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Defense papers cited this case but court could not locate the citation or match the caption.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Defense papers cited this case but court could not locate the citation or match the caption.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Defense papers cited this case but court could not locate the citation or match the caption.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Defense papers cited this case but court could not locate the citation or match the caption.
Show 15 additional discrepancies
- Fabricated: Case Law | Defense papers cited this case but court could not locate the citation or match the caption.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Defense papers cited this case but court could not locate the citation or match the caption.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Defense papers cited this case but court could not locate the citation or match the caption.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Defense papers cited this case but court could not locate the citation or match the caption.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Defense paper cited this correct case but court found it was used to support a proposition inconsistent with the case's holding.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Defense paper cited this correct case but court found it was used to support a proposition inconsistent with the case's holding.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Defense paper cited this correct case but court found it was used to support a proposition inconsistent with the case's holding.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Defense paper cited this correct case but court found it was used to support a proposition inconsistent with the case's holding.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Defense paper cited this correct case but court found it was used to support a proposition inconsistent with the case's holding.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Defense paper cited this correct case but court found it was used to support a proposition inconsistent with the case's holding.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Defense paper cited this correct case but court found it was used to support a proposition inconsistent with the case's holding.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Defense paper cited this correct case but court found it was used to support a proposition inconsistent with the case's holding.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Defense paper cited this correct case but court found it was used to support a proposition inconsistent with the case's holding.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Defense paper cited this correct case but court found it was used to support a proposition inconsistent with the case's holding.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Defense papers cited this case but court could not locate the citation or match the caption.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Polanco v. Brooklyn Rose LLC?
- In Polanco v. Brooklyn Rose LLC, the SC New York addressed a Fabricated: Case Law in a lawyer filing. The linked source records that defense papers cited this case but court could not locate the citation or match the caption. The recorded procedural consequence is Sanctions Hearing. The entry is dated 2026-06-16. It supports a focused account of the authority problem and does not establish an unrecorded AI tool, motive, or wider factual finding. The underlying source should be consulted for the complete filing and any later procedural developments.
- Why does Polanco v. Brooklyn Rose LLC matter for legal AI risk?
- The source records a concrete authority-verification problem in a state proceeding and the tribunal’s documented response to it.
- What does the public record establish about Polanco v. Brooklyn Rose LLC?
- Limited to the linked source and the documented citation or quotation issue and stated disposition; no unrecorded tool, motive, or broader litigation facts are inferred.
- Which source supports this Polanco v. Brooklyn Rose LLC summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.