Which source supports this Rodriguez v. Time Warner Entertainment summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

HomeCasesRodriguez v. Time Warner Entertainment

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 80/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.

Corpus matter record

Rodriguez v. Time Warner Entertainment

SC New York · Jul 22, 2026

NY / state Editorial impact: low fake citations tort trial None Adjudicated

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's opposition papers contained citations to non-existent cases; the court noted defendants pointed this out and a footnote records appellate counsel's disclosure; court declined to attribute the fabricated citations to appellate counsel in this filing.

Why the court cared: The structured public record identifies fake citations and tort and records a recorded judicial or procedural response. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now: This matter connects fake citations and tort with a recorded judicial or procedural response in SC New York. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This matter connects fake citations and tort with a recorded judicial or procedural response in SC New York. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

New YorkSingle-state evidence scope

Explore NYOpen its source-linked jurisdiction page and related matters.

CourtSC New York

Jurisdictionstate

Circuit2nd Circuit

DateJul 22, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeSee source

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's opposition papers contained citations to non-existent cases; the court noted defendants pointed this out and a footnote records appellate counsel's disclosure; court declined to attribute the fabricated citations to appellate counsel in this filing.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Rodriguez v. Time Warner Entertainment?: Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's opposition papers contained citations to non-existent cases; the court noted defendants pointed this out and a footnote records appellate counsel's disclosure; court declined to attribute the fabricated citations to appellate counsel in this filing.
Why does Rodriguez v. Time Warner Entertainment matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects fake citations and tort with a recorded judicial or procedural response in SC New York. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Rodriguez v. Time Warner Entertainment?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Rodriguez v. Time Warner Entertainment summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Polanco v. Brooklyn Rose LLCSC New York · Jun 16, 2026same court · fake citations + tort Vargas v. MTA Bus Co.SC New York · Jun 12, 2026same court · fake citations + tort Gully v VargheseSC New York · May 12, 2026same court · fake citations + tort Espinoza v. M&R Const. Group Inc.SC New York · Mar 19, 2026same court · fake citations + tort Ave. Capital Group, LLC v. StrumSC New York · Feb 9, 2026same court · fake citations + tort Cassata v. Michael Macrina Architect, P.C.SC New York · Jan 27, 2026same court · fake citations + tort

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source Suggest a correction to this record

Public-record statuspublic record, not an allegation-only entry

Indexing eligibilitypublicly indexable with evidence status disclosed

Published and maintained byManu Ayala · AI VortexIndependent legal AI risk intelligence

Corpus snapshot checked Aug 19, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Aug 19, 2026; latest tracked decision Aug 18, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Open SC New York profile Explore jurisdiction

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology