Back to case record
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
CASE BRIEF / REVIEW PACKETAV-CB-1JYCEMEGenerated September 11, 2026Evidence checked Sep 10, 2026
TRACKED PUBLIC MATTER

Evans, et al. v. Robertson et al. (3)

E.D. Michigan · Nov 20, 2025

Jurisdiction
federal
Court
E.D. Michigan
Record ID
evans-et-al-v-robertson-et-al-3-2025-11-20
Observed outcome
Multiple filings stricken from the record; Revocation of online upload privileges
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
ADVISOR READOUT

Why this matter warrants attention

False Quotes: Case Law | Provided a quotation attributed to Walden v. Fiore that does not appear in the opinion; court identified it as a false quote. Outcome: Multiple filings stricken from the record; Revocation of online upload privileges. Show Cause Order is here.

Why the decision-maker cared

False Quotes: Case Law | Provided a quotation attributed to Walden v. Fiore that does not appear in the opinion; court identified it as a false quote. || Fabricated: Case Law | Cited a Michigan Court of Appeals case the court could not locate; treated as a fabricated case citation. || Fabricated: Case Law | Cited an Eighth Circuit opinion that does not exist; court determined the citation refers to a different district-court filing. || Fabricated: Case Law | Repeated citation used four times that the court could not find; treated as fabricated. || Fabricated: Case Law | Citation identified by the court as not accurately representing an existing Sixth Circuit opinion. || Fabricated: Case Law | Cited an E.D. Mich. opinion that does not exist and quoted language not found in any located opinion. || Fabricated: Case Law | Cited a district-court opinion with a reporter citation that corresponds to a different case; court found the cited case does not exist as stated. || Fabricated: Case Law | Cited multiple opinions and entries that the court could not locate and deemed factitious (repeatedly used in the brief). || Fabricated: Case Law | Citation the court could not locate and treated as fabricated. || Fabricated: Case Law | Cited a Ninth Circuit opinion that does not exist under the given citation; court identified it as fabricated. || False Quotes: Case Law | Quoted Seay v. TVA about 'sur-replies are not permitted' but the court found the quotation does not appear in the opinion. || False Quotes: Case Law | Attributed a quotation to Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Ward that the court found does not exist in the opinion. || False Quotes: Case Law | Attributed a quotation to United States v. Shaffer Equip. Co. that the court found to be fabricated. || False Quotes: Case Law | Quoted Ready Transp. as stating that a stricken document 'ceases to exist for any purpose,' which the court found does not appear in that opinion. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Cited a real Sixth Circuit case but relied on a proposition the opinion does not support; court characterized this as a misrepresentation of the authority.

Why it matters now

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in E.D. Michigan, with the listed outcome: Multiple filings stricken from the record; Revocation of online upload privileges.

RECORDED ISSUES

Failure modes and consequences

  • Pro Se
  • Fake Citations
  • Fabricated Quotes
  • Misrepresented Authority
  • Trial
  • None Adjudicated
AI attribution
Reported
Recorded tool
AI (implied, unspecified)
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
Procedural posture
Multiple filings stricken from the record; Revocation of online upload privileges
PRIMARY SOURCE

reason.com

Secondary or other linked source. The recorded link is not classified as an official court source or docket mirror.

Open underlying source

A recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

What this record does—and does not—establish

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Latest evidence review: Secondary Source Only (medium confidence).

PRACTICAL REVIEW IMPLICATIONS

Controls suggested by the public record

  1. Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.
  2. Confirm that every authority actually supports the proposition for which it is offered.