Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Evans, et al. v. Robertson et al. (3)
E.D. Michigan · Nov 20, 2025
MI / federalEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsfabricated quotesmisrepresented authority
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
False Quotes: Case Law | Provided a quotation attributed to Walden v. Fiore that does not appear in the opinion; court identified it as a false quote. Outcome: Multiple filings stricken from the record; Revocation of online upload privileges. Show Cause Order is here.
- Why the court cared
- False Quotes: Case Law | Provided a quotation attributed to Walden v. Fiore that does not appear in the opinion; court identified it as a false quote. || Fabricated: Case Law | Cited a Michigan Court of Appeals case the court could not locate; treated as a fabricated case citation. || Fabricated: Case Law | Cited an Eighth Circuit opinion that does not exist; court determined the citation refers to a different district-court filing. || Fabricated: Case Law | Repeated citation used four times that the court could not find; treated as fabricated. || Fabricated: Case Law | Citation identified by the court as not accurately representing an existing Sixth Circuit opinion. || Fabricated: Case Law | Cited an E.D. Mich. opinion that does not exist and quoted language not found in any located opinion. || Fabricated: Case Law | Cited a district-court opinion with a reporter citation that corresponds to a different case; court found the cited case does not exist as stated. || Fabricated: Case Law | Cited multiple opinions and entries that the court could not locate and deemed factitious (repeatedly used in the brief). || Fabricated: Case Law | Citation the court could not locate and treated as fabricated. || Fabricated: Case Law | Cited a Ninth Circuit opinion that does not exist under the given citation; court identified it as fabricated. || False Quotes: Case Law | Quoted Seay v. TVA about 'sur-replies are not permitted' but the court found the quotation does not appear in the opinion. || False Quotes: Case Law | Attributed a quotation to Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Ward that the court found does not exist in the opinion. || False Quotes: Case Law | Attributed a quotation to United States v. Shaffer Equip. Co. that the court found to be fabricated. || False Quotes: Case Law | Quoted Ready Transp. as stating that a stricken document 'ceases to exist for any purpose,' which the court found does not appear in that opinion. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Cited a real Sixth Circuit case but relied on a proposition the opinion does not support; court characterized this as a misrepresentation of the authority.
- Why it matters now
- This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in E.D. Michigan, with the listed outcome: Multiple filings stricken from the record; Revocation of online upload privileges.
Why this matter is tracked
False Quotes: Case Law | Provided a quotation attributed to Walden v. Fiore that does not appear in the opinion; court identified it as a false quote. Outcome: Multiple filings stricken from the record; Revocation of online upload privileges. Show Cause Order is here.
Operational lesson
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in E.D. Michigan, with the listed outcome: Multiple filings stricken from the record; Revocation of online upload privileges.
Record details
MichiganSingle-state evidence scope
CourtE.D. Michigan
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit6th Circuit
DateNov 20, 2025
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeMultiple filings stricken from the record; Revocation of online upload privileges
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Multiple filings stricken from the record; Revocation of online upload privileges
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
15 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Provided a quotation attributed to Walden v. Fiore that does not appear in the opinion; court identified it as a false quote.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Cited a Michigan Court of Appeals case the court could not locate; treated as a fabricated case citation.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Cited an Eighth Circuit opinion that does not exist; court determined the citation refers to a different district-court filing.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Repeated citation used four times that the court could not find; treated as fabricated.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Citation identified by the court as not accurately representing an existing Sixth Circuit opinion.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Cited an E.D. Mich. opinion that does not exist and quoted language not found in any located opinion.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Cited a district-court opinion with a reporter citation that corresponds to a different case; court found the cited case does not exist as stated.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Cited multiple opinions and entries that the court could not locate and deemed factitious (repeatedly used in the brief).
Show 7 additional discrepancies
- Fabricated: Case Law | Citation the court could not locate and treated as fabricated.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Cited a Ninth Circuit opinion that does not exist under the given citation; court identified it as fabricated.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Quoted Seay v. TVA about 'sur-replies are not permitted' but the court found the quotation does not appear in the opinion.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Attributed a quotation to Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Ward that the court found does not exist in the opinion.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Attributed a quotation to United States v. Shaffer Equip. Co. that the court found to be fabricated.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Quoted Ready Transp. as stating that a stricken document 'ceases to exist for any purpose,' which the court found does not appear in that opinion.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Cited a real Sixth Circuit case but relied on a proposition the opinion does not support; court characterized this as a misrepresentation of the authority.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Evans, et al. v. Robertson et al. (3)?
- False Quotes: Case Law | Provided a quotation attributed to Walden v. Fiore that does not appear in the opinion; court identified it as a false quote. Outcome: Multiple filings stricken from the record; Revocation of online upload privileges. Show Cause Order is here.
- Why does Evans, et al. v. Robertson et al. (3) matter for legal AI risk?
- This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in E.D. Michigan, with the listed outcome: Multiple filings stricken from the record; Revocation of online upload privileges.
- What does the public record establish about Evans, et al. v. Robertson et al. (3)?
- Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
- Which source supports this Evans, et al. v. Robertson et al. (3) summary?
- The recorded source is reason.com. It is classified as secondary or other linked source; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.