Fiscalía General de la Nación v. Luis Alberto Contreras Fandinoe
Tribunal Superior de Bogotá · Dec 2, 2025
- Jurisdiction
- international
- Court
- Tribunal Superior de Bogotá
- Record ID
- fiscalia-general-de-la-nacion-v-luis-alberto-contreras-fandinoe-2025-12-02
- Observed outcome
- The conviction was quashed, the case was remanded for a new trial, and the matter was referred to the disciplinary commission for investigation of the trial judge.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
The Tribunal Superior de Bogotá quashed a criminal conviction and remanded the case for a new trial because the trial judge used AI to generate legal reasoning that included fabricated case law and non-existent doctrinal sources. The appellate court found this constituted a failure of human oversight and a violation of the defendant's due process rights.
Misrepresented: Case Law | First-instance judgment attributed a passage to 'SP414-2023, rad. 61005' about congruence; the appellate court found the cited content does not correspond to that decision. || Fabricated: Doctrinal Work | First-instance opinion referenced doctrinal work 'Derecho Procesal Penal Colombiano' by Fernando Velásquez Velásquez, which the appellate court found to be nonexistent. || Fabricated: Case Law | Decision cited multiple non-existent Corte Suprema decisions (said to support exclusion of CD loss); those citations do not exist in the repository. || Misrepresented: Case Law | The judgment quoted and paraphrased Constitutional Court decision C-591 de 2005 in a way the appellate court held was not supported by the original text.
This record documents a Judge filing issue in Tribunal Superior de Bogotá, with the listed outcome: Judgment quashed and remanded; copies sent to disciplinary commission..
Failure modes and consequences
- Fake Citations
- Fabricated Quotes
- Misrepresented Authority
- Bar Referral
- Criminal
- Trial
- AI attribution
- Implied
- Recorded tool
- AI (unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Appellate review of a criminal conviction; the Tribunal Superior de Bogotá quashed the first-instance judgment and remanded the case for a new trial.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The court explicitly references the judge's use of AI tools.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.
- Confirm that every authority actually supports the proposition for which it is offered.