Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Fiscalía General de la Nación v. Luis Alberto Contreras Fandinoe
Tribunal Superior de Bogotá · Dec 2, 2025
ColombiaEditorial impact: highfake citationsfabricated quotesmisrepresented authoritybar referral
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Misrepresented: Case Law | First-instance judgment attributed a passage to 'SP414-2023, rad. 61005' about congruence; the appellate court found the cited content does not correspond to that decision. Outcome: Judgment quashed and remanded; copies sent to disciplinary commission..
- Why the court cared
- Misrepresented: Case Law | First-instance judgment attributed a passage to 'SP414-2023, rad. 61005' about congruence; the appellate court found the cited content does not correspond to that decision. || Fabricated: Doctrinal Work | First-instance opinion referenced doctrinal work 'Derecho Procesal Penal Colombiano' by Fernando Velásquez Velásquez, which the appellate court found to be nonexistent. || Fabricated: Case Law | Decision cited multiple non-existent Corte Suprema decisions (said to support exclusion of CD loss); those citations do not exist in the repository. || Misrepresented: Case Law | The judgment quoted and paraphrased Constitutional Court decision C-591 de 2005 in a way the appellate court held was not supported by the original text.
- Why it matters now
- This record documents a Judge filing issue in Tribunal Superior de Bogotá, with the listed outcome: Judgment quashed and remanded; copies sent to disciplinary commission..
Why this matter is tracked
Misrepresented: Case Law | First-instance judgment attributed a passage to 'SP414-2023, rad. 61005' about congruence; the appellate court found the cited content does not correspond to that decision. Outcome: Judgment quashed and remanded; copies sent to disciplinary commission..
Operational lesson
This record documents a Judge filing issue in Tribunal Superior de Bogotá, with the listed outcome: Judgment quashed and remanded; copies sent to disciplinary commission..
Record details
CourtTribunal Superior de Bogotá
Jurisdictioninternational
CircuitNot recorded
DateDec 2, 2025
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typeJudge
OutcomeJudgment quashed and remanded; copies sent to disciplinary commission.
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionYes
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Judgment quashed and remanded; copies sent to disciplinary commission.
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | First-instance judgment attributed a passage to 'SP414-2023, rad. 61005' about congruence; the appellate court found the cited content does not correspond to that decision.
- Fabricated: Doctrinal Work | First-instance opinion referenced doctrinal work 'Derecho Procesal Penal Colombiano' by Fernando Velásquez Velásquez, which the appellate court found to be nonexistent.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Decision cited multiple non-existent Corte Suprema decisions (said to support exclusion of CD loss); those citations do not exist in the repository.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | The judgment quoted and paraphrased Constitutional Court decision C-591 de 2005 in a way the appellate court held was not supported by the original text.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Fiscalía General de la Nación v. Luis Alberto Contreras Fandinoe?
- Misrepresented: Case Law | First-instance judgment attributed a passage to 'SP414-2023, rad. 61005' about congruence; the appellate court found the cited content does not correspond to that decision. Outcome: Judgment quashed and remanded; copies sent to disciplinary commission..
- Why does Fiscalía General de la Nación v. Luis Alberto Contreras Fandinoe matter for legal AI risk?
- This record documents a Judge filing issue in Tribunal Superior de Bogotá, with the listed outcome: Judgment quashed and remanded; copies sent to disciplinary commission..
- What does the public record establish about Fiscalía General de la Nación v. Luis Alberto Contreras Fandinoe?
- Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
- Which source supports this Fiscalía General de la Nación v. Luis Alberto Contreras Fandinoe summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.