Francois v. Medina
Supreme Court, NY · Mar 24, 2025
- Jurisdiction
- state
- Court
- Supreme Court, NY
- Record ID
- francois-v-medina-2025-03-24
- Observed outcome
- Warning
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
In Francois v. Medina, a New York Supreme Court warning followed counsel's reliance on the nonexistent United States v. Harris, 761 F. Supp. 409, and on a quotation that does not appear in the authority cited. No monetary sanction is recorded in the available source. The incident record does not reliably name an AI product, so the tool field should remain unidentified.
The linked record identifies trial and records Warning. This page does not infer judicial reasoning beyond the source.
New York trial courts are still issuing warnings rather than fines; this leniency window is closing fast.
Failure modes and consequences
- Trial
- Warning
- AI attribution
- Not Established
- Recorded tool
- Unidentified
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Warning
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Latest evidence review: Metadata Only (medium confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.