Francois v. Medina
Supreme Court, NY · Mar 24, 2025
What happened in this matter?
In Francois v. Medina, a New York Supreme Court warning followed counsel's reliance on the nonexistent United States v. Harris, 761 F. Supp. 409, and on a quotation that does not appear in the authority cited. No monetary sanction is recorded in the available source. The incident record does not reliably name an AI product, so the tool field should remain unidentified.
- Why the court cared
- The linked record identifies trial and records Warning. This page does not infer judicial reasoning beyond the source.
- Why it matters now
- New York trial courts are still issuing warnings rather than fines; this leniency window is closing fast.
Why this matter is tracked
In Francois v. Medina, a New York Supreme Court warning followed counsel's reliance on the nonexistent United States v. Harris, 761 F. Supp. 409, and on a quotation that does not appear in the authority cited. No monetary sanction is recorded in the available source. The incident record does not reliably name an AI product, so the tool field should remain unidentified.
New York trial courts are still issuing warnings rather than fines; this leniency window is closing fast.
Record details
What the record establishes about AI use
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
Warning
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Francois v. Medina?
- In Francois v. Medina, a New York Supreme Court warning followed counsel's reliance on the nonexistent United States v. Harris, 761 F. Supp. 409, and on a quotation that does not appear in the authority cited. No monetary sanction is recorded in the available source. The incident record does not reliably name an AI product, so the tool field should remain unidentified.
- Why does Francois v. Medina matter for legal AI risk?
- New York trial courts are still issuing warnings rather than fines; this leniency window is closing fast.
- What does the public record establish about Francois v. Medina?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Francois v. Medina summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.