HomeCasesFrancois v. Medina

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Francois v. Medina

Supreme Court, NY · Mar 24, 2025

NY / stateEditorial impact: lowtrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

In Francois v. Medina, a New York Supreme Court warning followed counsel's reliance on the nonexistent United States v. Harris, 761 F. Supp. 409, and on a quotation that does not appear in the authority cited. No monetary sanction is recorded in the available source. The incident record does not reliably name an AI product, so the tool field should remain unidentified.

Why the court cared: The linked record identifies trial and records Warning. This page does not infer judicial reasoning beyond the source.
Why it matters now: New York trial courts are still issuing warnings rather than fines; this leniency window is closing fast.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

New York trial courts are still issuing warnings rather than fines; this leniency window is closing fast.

Record details

New YorkSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtSupreme Court, NY

Jurisdictionstate

Circuit2nd Circuit

DateMar 24, 2025

AI toolUnidentified

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeWarning

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

Warning

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Francois v. Medina?: In Francois v. Medina, a New York Supreme Court warning followed counsel's reliance on the nonexistent United States v. Harris, 761 F. Supp. 409, and on a quotation that does not appear in the authority cited. No monetary sanction is recorded in the available source. The incident record does not reliably name an AI product, so the tool field should remain unidentified.
Why does Francois v. Medina matter for legal AI risk?: New York trial courts are still issuing warnings rather than fines; this leniency window is closing fast.
What does the public record establish about Francois v. Medina?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Francois v. Medina summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Cartagena v. Dixon, Blackburn, and T.A. Blackburn Law (2)S.D. New York · Jul 10, 2026same jurisdiction · trial Strategic Funding Source, Inc. v. STI-NY, LLCSC New York · May 28, 2026same jurisdiction · trial DOE, J. et al v. The Trustees of Columbia UniversitySC New York · May 5, 2026same jurisdiction · trial Keefe v. BMakin Film LtdSC New York · Apr 24, 2026same jurisdiction · trial In re Prince Global Holdings Limited, et al.S.D. New York (Bankruptcy) · Apr 18, 2026same jurisdiction · trial Ellen Michaelis v. Wilmington Savings Fund SocietySC New York · Apr 3, 2026same jurisdiction · trial

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

New York trial courts are still issuing warnings rather than fines; this leniency window is closing fast.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Francois v. Medina?

Why does Francois v. Medina matter for legal AI risk?

New York trial courts are still issuing warnings rather than fines; this leniency window is closing fast.

What does the public record establish about Francois v. Medina?

Which source supports this Francois v. Medina summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.