Public trackerCorpus refreshed Sep 1, 2026 · Latest decision Aug 31, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesAshmeade v. Amazon.com Services LLC
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

Ashmeade v. Amazon.com Services LLC

S.D. New York · Aug 27, 2026

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited “In re State Street Bank and Trust Co. ERISA Litig., No. 07-cv-10907, 2009 WL 10260136, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 8, 2009)”; court found the Westlaw number and caption did not correspond to a real decision. Outcome: Warning.

Why the court cared
The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records Warning. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Warning in S.D. New York. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited “In re State Street Bank and Trust Co. ERISA Litig., No. 07-cv-10907, 2009 WL 10260136, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 8, 2009)”; court found the Westlaw number and caption did not correspond to a real decision. Outcome: Warning.

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Warning in S.D. New York. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

New YorkSingle-state evidence scope
Explore NYOpen its source-linked jurisdiction page and related matters.
CourtS.D. New York
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit2nd Circuit
DateAug 27, 2026
UN
AI toolUnidentified
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeWarning
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

Warning

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited “In re State Street Bank and Trust Co. ERISA Litig., No. 07-cv-10907, 2009 WL 10260136, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 8, 2009)”; court found the Westlaw number and caption did not correspond to a real decision.
  2. Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited “SEC v. Collins, No. 01-cv-3065, 2002 WL 31109065, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 23, 2002)”; court found no decision matching that Westlaw number or caption (noting a different SEC v. Collins & Aikman Corp., 256 F.R.D. 403 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) exists but with different citation).

Questions this record answers

What happened in Ashmeade v. Amazon.com Services LLC?
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited “In re State Street Bank and Trust Co. ERISA Litig., No. 07-cv-10907, 2009 WL 10260136, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 8, 2009)”; court found the Westlaw number and caption did not correspond to a real decision. Outcome: Warning.
Why does Ashmeade v. Amazon.com Services LLC matter for legal AI risk?
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Warning in S.D. New York. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Ashmeade v. Amazon.com Services LLC?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Ashmeade v. Amazon.com Services LLC summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.