Back to case record
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
CASE BRIEF / REVIEW PACKETAV-CB-16UZ858Generated November 7, 2026Evidence checked Nov 7, 2026
TRACKED PUBLIC MATTER

Girija Kadlaskar v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services

D. Nebraska · Aug 6, 2026

Short answer. Status: Warning: the court found a cited authority (785 F.2d 245) does not exist and another lacks the quoted language, and cautioned counsel about his duty of candor and Rule 11(b)(2) (2026 WL 2267773, PDF p. 4); amount: no amount stated. D. Nebraska, decision date on record August 6, 2026. As of November 7, 2026. Court source · Methodology

Jurisdiction
Federal
Court
D. Nebraska
Record ID
girija-kadlaskar-v-united-states-citizenship-and-immigration-services-2026-08-06
Observed outcome
Warning: the court found a cited authority (785 F.2d 245) does not exist and another lacks the quoted language, and cautioned counsel about his duty of candor and Rule 11(b)(2) (2026 WL 2267773, PDF p. 4)
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
ADVISOR READOUT

Why this matter warrants attention

Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited a non-existent Eighth Circuit case 'Peterson v. U.S. Retirement Board, 785 F.2d 245' to support an EAJA proposition; the Court found the citation fabricated and traced the wording to a committee report quoted in Jackson v. Bowen. Outcome: Warning: the court found a cited authority (785 F.2d 245) does not exist and another lacks the quoted language, and cautioned counsel about his duty of candor and Rule 11(b)(2) (2026 WL 2267773, PDF p. 4).

Why the decision-maker cared

The structured public record identifies fake citations and fabricated quotes and records Warning: the court found a cited authority (785 F.2d 245) does not exist and another lacks the quoted language, and cautioned counsel about his duty of candor and Rule 11(b)(2) (2026 WL 2267773, PDF p. 4). The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.

Why it matters now

This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Warning: the court found a cited authority (785 F.2d 245) does not exist and another lacks the quoted language, and cautioned counsel about his duty of candor and Rule 11(b)(2) (2026 WL 2267773, PDF p. 4) in D. Nebraska. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

RECORDED ISSUES

Failure modes and consequences

  • Fake Citations
  • Fabricated Quotes
  • Immigration
  • Trial
  • Warning
AI attribution
Not Established
Recorded tool
No tool named in source
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
Procedural posture
Warning: the court found a cited authority (785 F.2d 245) does not exist and another lacks the quoted language, and cautioned counsel about his duty of candor and Rule 11(b)(2) (2026 WL 2267773, PDF p. 4)
PRIMARY SOURCE

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open underlying source

A recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

What this record does—and does not—establish

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

PRACTICAL REVIEW IMPLICATIONS

Controls suggested by the public record

  1. Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
  2. Compare every quoted passage and pincite directly with the underlying opinion or filing.
  3. Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.