HomeCasesCatarina Almeida Porfirio v. Homeland Security, et al.

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 76/100. It remains available for research but is excluded from search indexing until its documented evidence gaps are resolved.

Corpus matter record

Catarina Almeida Porfirio v. Homeland Security, et al.

D. D.C. · Jul 23, 2026

DC / federalEditorial impact: lowfake citationsfabricated quotesmisrepresented authorityimmigration

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Opposition brief cites 'Ravenell v. Van Buren, 2019 WL 6619363 (D.D.C. Dec. 5, 2019)'; the government could not locate the case and the Court also could not find it.

Why the court cared: The structured public record identifies fake citations and fabricated quotes and records a recorded judicial or procedural response. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now: This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with a recorded judicial or procedural response in D. D.C.. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Opposition brief cites 'Ravenell v. Van Buren, 2019 WL 6619363 (D.D.C. Dec. 5, 2019)'; the government could not locate the case and the Court also could not find it.

Operational lesson

This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with a recorded judicial or procedural response in D. D.C.. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

District of ColumbiaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtD. D.C.

Jurisdictionfederal

CircuitD.C. Circuit

DateJul 23, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeSee source

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Opposition brief cites 'Ravenell v. Van Buren, 2019 WL 6619363 (D.D.C. Dec. 5, 2019)'; the government could not locate the case and the Court also could not find it.
Fabricated: Case Law | Opposition brief cites 'Hand & Hand, LLC v. U.S. Dep’t of Health & Hum. Servs., 21 F. Supp. 3d 8 (D.D.C. 2014)'; the Court was unable to locate this authority.
Misrepresented: Case Law | Brief mischaracterizes and misstates holdings (e.g., describes this Court's Wolfram decision as 'denying transfer' though Wolfram transferred the case).
False Quotes: Other | Some quotations used in the opposition brief could not be located or verified by the Court.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Catarina Almeida Porfirio v. Homeland Security, et al.?: Fabricated: Case Law | Opposition brief cites 'Ravenell v. Van Buren, 2019 WL 6619363 (D.D.C. Dec. 5, 2019)'; the government could not locate the case and the Court also could not find it.
Why does Catarina Almeida Porfirio v. Homeland Security, et al. matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with a recorded judicial or procedural response in D. D.C.. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Catarina Almeida Porfirio v. Homeland Security, et al.?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Catarina Almeida Porfirio v. Homeland Security, et al. summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Zavadovsky v. Republic of Austria, et al.D. DC · Mar 31, 2026same jurisdiction · fake citations + fabricated quotes Ekeocha v. U.S. Department of StateD. DC · Nov 19, 2025same jurisdiction · fake citations + fabricated quotes Virginia Montoya Cabanas v. Pamela Bondi, et al.S.D. Texas · Nov 13, 2025fake citations + fabricated quotes · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Nguedi v. General Dynamics Information TechnologyD. DC · Mar 31, 2026same jurisdiction · fake citations + fabricated quotes Wanyu Zhang v. National Public Radio, Inc.D. DC · Dec 18, 2025same jurisdiction · fake citations + fabricated quotes Smith v. Athena Construction Group, Inc.D. DC · Oct 3, 2025same jurisdiction · fake citations + fabricated quotes

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusresearch hold

Published and maintained byManu Ayala · AI VortexIndependent legal AI risk intelligence

Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 27, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 24, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Opposition brief cites 'Ravenell v. Van Buren, 2019 WL 6619363 (D.D.C. Dec. 5, 2019)'; the government could not locate the case and the Court also could not find it.

Operational lesson

Record details

District of ColumbiaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtD. D.C.

Jurisdictionfederal

CircuitD.C. Circuit

DateJul 23, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeSee source

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Tracked discrepancy record

4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Opposition brief cites 'Ravenell v. Van Buren, 2019 WL 6619363 (D.D.C. Dec. 5, 2019)'; the government could not locate the case and the Court also could not find it.

Fabricated: Case Law | Opposition brief cites 'Hand & Hand, LLC v. U.S. Dep’t of Health & Hum. Servs., 21 F. Supp. 3d 8 (D.D.C. 2014)'; the Court was unable to locate this authority.

Misrepresented: Case Law | Brief mischaracterizes and misstates holdings (e.g., describes this Court's Wolfram decision as 'denying transfer' though Wolfram transferred the case).

False Quotes: Other | Some quotations used in the opposition brief could not be located or verified by the Court.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Catarina Almeida Porfirio v. Homeland Security, et al.?

Fabricated: Case Law | Opposition brief cites 'Ravenell v. Van Buren, 2019 WL 6619363 (D.D.C. Dec. 5, 2019)'; the government could not locate the case and the Court also could not find it.

Why does Catarina Almeida Porfirio v. Homeland Security, et al. matter for legal AI risk?

What does the public record establish about Catarina Almeida Porfirio v. Homeland Security, et al.?

Which source supports this Catarina Almeida Porfirio v. Homeland Security, et al. summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.