AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK
AI visibilityConsultingSearch free
Public trackerCorpus refreshed Aug 12, 2026 · Latest decision Aug 11, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesCatarina Almeida Porfirio v. Homeland Security, et al.
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 76/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

Catarina Almeida Porfirio v. Homeland Security, et al.

D. D.C. · Jul 23, 2026

DC / federalEditorial impact: lowfake citationsfabricated quotesmisrepresented authorityimmigrationNone Adjudicated
Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Opposition brief cites 'Ravenell v. Van Buren, 2019 WL 6619363 (D.D.C. Dec. 5, 2019)'; the government could not locate the case and the Court also could not find it.

Why the court cared
The structured public record identifies fake citations and fabricated quotes and records a recorded judicial or procedural response. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now
This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with a recorded judicial or procedural response in D. D.C.. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Opposition brief cites 'Ravenell v. Van Buren, 2019 WL 6619363 (D.D.C. Dec. 5, 2019)'; the government could not locate the case and the Court also could not find it.

Operational lesson

This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with a recorded judicial or procedural response in D. D.C.. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

District of ColumbiaSingle-state evidence scope
Explore DCOpen its source-linked jurisdiction page and related matters.
CourtD. D.C.
Jurisdictionfederal
CircuitD.C. Circuit
DateJul 23, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeSee source
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Fabricated: Case Law | Opposition brief cites 'Ravenell v. Van Buren, 2019 WL 6619363 (D.D.C. Dec. 5, 2019)'; the government could not locate the case and the Court also could not find it.
  2. Fabricated: Case Law | Opposition brief cites 'Hand & Hand, LLC v. U.S. Dep’t of Health & Hum. Servs., 21 F. Supp. 3d 8 (D.D.C. 2014)'; the Court was unable to locate this authority.
  3. Misrepresented: Case Law | Brief mischaracterizes and misstates holdings (e.g., describes this Court's Wolfram decision as 'denying transfer' though Wolfram transferred the case).
  4. False Quotes: Other | Some quotations used in the opposition brief could not be located or verified by the Court.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Catarina Almeida Porfirio v. Homeland Security, et al.?
Fabricated: Case Law | Opposition brief cites 'Ravenell v. Van Buren, 2019 WL 6619363 (D.D.C. Dec. 5, 2019)'; the government could not locate the case and the Court also could not find it.
Why does Catarina Almeida Porfirio v. Homeland Security, et al. matter for legal AI risk?
This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with a recorded judicial or procedural response in D. D.C.. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Catarina Almeida Porfirio v. Homeland Security, et al.?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Catarina Almeida Porfirio v. Homeland Security, et al. summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Zavadovsky v. Republic of Austria, et al.D. DC · Mar 31, 2026same jurisdiction · fake citations + fabricated quotesEkeocha v. U.S. Department of StateD. DC · Nov 19, 2025same jurisdiction · fake citations + fabricated quotesVirginia Montoya Cabanas v. Pamela Bondi, et al.S.D. Texas · Nov 13, 2025fake citations + fabricated quotes · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Nguedi v. General Dynamics Information TechnologyD. DC · Mar 31, 2026same jurisdiction · fake citations + fabricated quotesWanyu Zhang v. National Public Radio, Inc.D. DC · Dec 18, 2025same jurisdiction · fake citations + fabricated quotesSmith v. Athena Construction Group, Inc.D. DC · Oct 3, 2025same jurisdiction · fake citations + fabricated quotes