Girija Kadlaskar v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
D. Nebraska · Aug 6, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- federal
- Court
- D. Nebraska
- Record ID
- girija-kadlaskar-v-united-states-citizenship-and-immigration-services-2026-08-06
- Observed outcome
- Warning
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited a non-existent Eighth Circuit case 'Peterson v. U.S. Retirement Board, 785 F.2d 245' to support an EAJA proposition; the Court found the citation fabricated and traced the wording to a committee report quoted in Jackson v. Bowen. Outcome: Warning.
The structured public record identifies fake citations and fabricated quotes and records Warning. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Warning in D. Nebraska. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fake Citations
- Fabricated Quotes
- Immigration
- Trial
- Warning
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Warning
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
- Compare every quoted passage and pincite directly with the underlying opinion or filing.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.