Jacob Doe v. The University of North Carolina System
W.D. North Carolina · Nov 10, 2025
- Jurisdiction
- federal
- Court
- W.D. North Carolina
- Record ID
- jacob-doe-v-the-university-of-north-carolina-system-2025-11-10
- Observed outcome
- The court issued an order to show cause requiring counsel to appear at a hearing to address potential sanctions.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
The court issued an order to show cause requiring the Plaintiff's counsel to explain why they should not be sanctioned for submitting filings containing fabricated case law, non-existent quotes, and mischaracterized legal authorities, which the court identified as potential AI hallucinations.
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited two cases that the Court found do not appear to exist. || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff quoted material that does not exist in the cases purportedly quoted. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Court identified mischaracterizations of the holdings of cited cases in the Plaintiff's briefs. || Misrepresented: Case Law | An out-of-circuit case was misidentified in the briefs as a Fourth Circuit case.
Check every jurisdictional tag on cited cases — a misidentified circuit can void your argument and draw a show-cause.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fake Citations
- Fabricated Quotes
- Misrepresented Authority
- Civil Rights
- Trial
- Ordered To Show Cause
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- The court issued a sua sponte order to show cause following the briefing of dispositive motions, requiring counsel to appear at a hearing to address potential Rule 11 violations.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.
- Assign a responsible reviewer for AI-assisted research and drafting.
- Retain a matter-level record of source checks and corrections.