Wayne K. Smith, Sr. v. Polk County, et al.
Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0), which credits Jesse Schaefer; document hosted in his archive: open the upstream document. What AI Vortex adds.
W.D. North Carolina · Aug 7, 2026
What happened in this matter?
False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff's opening brief attributes a quotation to Board of County Commissioners v. Brown that does not appear verbatim in that decision; Court labels it a fabricated quotation and counsel acknowledges the inaccuracy. Outcome: No Sanction. Order to Show Cause is here.
- Why the court cared
- The structured public record identifies fabricated quotes and civil rights and records No Sanction. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects fabricated quotes and civil rights with No Sanction in W.D. North Carolina. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff's opening brief attributes a quotation to Board of County Commissioners v. Brown that does not appear verbatim in that decision; Court labels it a fabricated quotation and counsel acknowledges the inaccuracy. Outcome: No Sanction. Order to Show Cause is here.
This matter connects fabricated quotes and civil rights with No Sanction in W.D. North Carolina. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
Corrected 2026-10-30: see the corrections log.
What the record establishes about AI use
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
No Sanction
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff's opening brief attributes a quotation to Board of County Commissioners v. Brown that does not appear verbatim in that decision; Court labels it a fabricated quotation and counsel acknowledges the inaccuracy.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff's opening brief attributes a quotation to Laber v. Harvey that is a misquotation; counsel acknowledges the misquotation though contends the underlying principle is correct.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Wayne K. Smith, Sr. v. Polk County, et al.?
- False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff's opening brief attributes a quotation to Board of County Commissioners v. Brown that does not appear verbatim in that decision; Court labels it a fabricated quotation and counsel acknowledges the inaccuracy. Outcome: No Sanction. Order to Show Cause is here.
- Why does Wayne K. Smith, Sr. v. Polk County, et al. matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects fabricated quotes and civil rights with No Sanction in W.D. North Carolina. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about Wayne K. Smith, Sr. v. Polk County, et al.?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Wayne K. Smith, Sr. v. Polk County, et al. summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases
One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.