AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK
AI visibilityConsultingSearch free
Public trackerCorpus refreshed Aug 16, 2026 · Latest decision Aug 13, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesWayne K. Smith, Sr. v. Polk County, et al.
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

Wayne K. Smith, Sr. v. Polk County, et al.

W.D. North Carolina · Aug 7, 2026

NC / federalEditorial impact: lowfake citationsfabricated quotescivil rightstrialNone Adjudicated
Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff's opening brief attributes a quotation to Board of County Commissioners v. Brown that does not appear verbatim in that decision; Court labels it a fabricated quotation and counsel acknowledges the inaccuracy. Outcome: No Sanction. Order to Show Cause is here.

Why the court cared
The structured public record identifies fake citations and fabricated quotes and records No Sanction. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now
This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with No Sanction in W.D. North Carolina. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff's opening brief attributes a quotation to Board of County Commissioners v. Brown that does not appear verbatim in that decision; Court labels it a fabricated quotation and counsel acknowledges the inaccuracy. Outcome: No Sanction. Order to Show Cause is here.

Operational lesson

This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with No Sanction in W.D. North Carolina. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

North CarolinaSingle-state evidence scope
Explore NCOpen its source-linked jurisdiction page and related matters.
CourtW.D. North Carolina
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit4th Circuit
DateAug 7, 2026
UN
AI toolUnidentified
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeNo Sanction
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

No Sanction

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff's opening brief attributes a quotation to Board of County Commissioners v. Brown that does not appear verbatim in that decision; Court labels it a fabricated quotation and counsel acknowledges the inaccuracy.
  2. False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff's opening brief attributes a quotation to Laber v. Harvey that is a misquotation; counsel acknowledges the misquotation though contends the underlying principle is correct.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Wayne K. Smith, Sr. v. Polk County, et al.?
False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff's opening brief attributes a quotation to Board of County Commissioners v. Brown that does not appear verbatim in that decision; Court labels it a fabricated quotation and counsel acknowledges the inaccuracy. Outcome: No Sanction. Order to Show Cause is here.
Why does Wayne K. Smith, Sr. v. Polk County, et al. matter for legal AI risk?
This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with No Sanction in W.D. North Carolina. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Wayne K. Smith, Sr. v. Polk County, et al.?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Wayne K. Smith, Sr. v. Polk County, et al. summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Wayne K. Smith, Sr. v. Polk County, et al.W.D. North Carolina · Jun 3, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotesJacob Doe v. The University of North Carolina SystemW.D. North Carolina · Nov 10, 2025same court · fake citations + fabricated quotesJacob Doe v. The University of North Carolina System, et al.W.D. North Carolina · Jun 16, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotesMescall v. Renaissance at AntiquityW.D. North Carolina · Nov 13, 2023same court · civil rights + trialEbony Sherisse Lucas v. Charles W. Scharf, et al.W.D. North Carolina · Feb 24, 2026same court · fake citations + trialUnited States of America v. Lorenzio Reshaud SimmonsE.D. North Carolina · Oct 3, 2025same jurisdiction · fake citations + fabricated quotes