Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 86/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Jacob Doe v. The University of North Carolina System
W.D. North Carolina · Nov 10, 2025
NC / federalEditorial impact: mediumfake citationsfabricated quotesmisrepresented authoritycivil rights
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited two cases that the Court found do not appear to exist. Outcome: Order to show cause.
- Why the court cared
- Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited two cases that the Court found do not appear to exist. || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff quoted material that does not exist in the cases purportedly quoted. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Court identified mischaracterizations of the holdings of cited cases in the Plaintiff's briefs. || Misrepresented: Case Law | An out-of-circuit case was misidentified in the briefs as a Fourth Circuit case.
- Why it matters now
- Check every jurisdictional tag on cited cases — a misidentified circuit can void your argument and draw a show-cause.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited two cases that the Court found do not appear to exist. Outcome: Order to show cause.
Operational lesson
Check every jurisdictional tag on cited cases — a misidentified circuit can void your argument and draw a show-cause.
Record details
North CarolinaSingle-state evidence scope
CourtW.D. North Carolina
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit4th Circuit
DateNov 10, 2025
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeOrder to show cause
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Order to show cause
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited two cases that the Court found do not appear to exist.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff quoted material that does not exist in the cases purportedly quoted.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Court identified mischaracterizations of the holdings of cited cases in the Plaintiff's briefs.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | An out-of-circuit case was misidentified in the briefs as a Fourth Circuit case.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Jacob Doe v. The University of North Carolina System?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited two cases that the Court found do not appear to exist. Outcome: Order to show cause.
- Why does Jacob Doe v. The University of North Carolina System matter for legal AI risk?
- Check every jurisdictional tag on cited cases — a misidentified circuit can void your argument and draw a show-cause.
- What does the public record establish about Jacob Doe v. The University of North Carolina System?
- Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
- Which source supports this Jacob Doe v. The University of North Carolina System summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.