Jacob Doe v. The University of North Carolina System, et al.
W.D. North Carolina · Jun 16, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- federal
- Court
- W.D. North Carolina
- Record ID
- jacob-doe-v-the-university-of-north-carolina-system-et-al-2026-06-16
- Observed outcome
- No sanction (but strong disappointment)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited two cases that do not appear to exist; the Court described these as hallucinated/fabricated citations. Outcome: No sanction (but strong disappointment). The Court found that plaintiff counsel submitted filings containing multiple AI-driven errors: two cited cases that do not appear to exist (fabricated citations), quotations that do not exist in the purported source cases (hallucinated quotations), and mischaracterizations of cited holdings. Following an order to show cause (here), Counsel admitted these errors at a show-cause hearing, blamed misuse/failure to verify outputs of AI tools, and published an article as remediation.…
The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is No sanction (but strong disappointment); the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes involving Unidentified with No sanction (but strong disappointment) in W.D. North Carolina, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fake Citations
- Fabricated Quotes
- Misrepresented Authority
- Other
- Trial
- None Adjudicated
- AI attribution
- Not Established
- Recorded tool
- Unidentified
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- No sanction (but strong disappointment)
reason.com
Secondary or other linked source. The recorded link is not classified as an official court source or docket mirror.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded link is a secondary or other public source and should be checked against the docket where available. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Latest evidence review: Secondary Source Only (medium confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
- Compare every quoted passage and pincite directly with the underlying opinion or filing.
- Confirm that each authority supports the stated proposition and has not been mischaracterized.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.