Johnson v. Digital Federal Credit Union
N.D. Texas · Dec 30, 2025
- Jurisdiction
- federal
- Court
- N.D. Texas
- Record ID
- johnson-v-digital-federal-credit-union-2025-12-30
- Observed outcome
- The court granted the defendant's motion to dismiss and entered judgment dismissing the suit with prejudice.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
The court dismissed the plaintiff's claims with prejudice after finding the complaint failed to state a claim. The court specifically identified that the plaintiff cited a non-existent case to support her legal arguments, which the court rejected as part of its broader dismissal of the action.
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a non-existent case for the proposition that an "Overdraft Protection Plan constitutes 'credit'"; the court noted the case does not exist and declined to rely on it.
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in N.D. Texas, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Contract
- Trial
- None Adjudicated
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- The court granted the defendant's motion to dismiss the second amended complaint with prejudice under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6).
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.