HomeCasesJayroe v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Jayroe v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company

N.D. Texas · Oct 27, 2025

TX / federalEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationscontracttrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Villatoro v. GWL Cmt. Mgmt., LLC, 2013 WL 12101130 (S.D. Tex. Jan. 22, 2013)', which the court found does not exist; Westlaw link led to an unrelated Hopwood opinion. Outcome: Warning.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Warning; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Warning in N.D. Texas, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Warning in N.D. Texas, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

TexasSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtN.D. Texas

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit5th Circuit

DateOct 27, 2025

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeWarning

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Warning

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Villatoro v. GWL Cmt. Mgmt., LLC, 2013 WL 12101130 (S.D. Tex. Jan. 22, 2013)', which the court found does not exist; Westlaw link led to an unrelated Hopwood opinion.
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Ortiz v. General Motors Corp., 2008 WL 2620736 (N.D. Tex. June 30, 2008)', which the court identified as a problematic, non-existent authority.
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Cowart v. AVIK Services, No. 3:19-CV-00101, 2019 WL 1745988 (S.D. Tex. 2019)', another citation the court deemed non-existent or AI-generated.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Jayroe v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company?: Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Villatoro v. GWL Cmt. Mgmt., LLC, 2013 WL 12101130 (S.D. Tex. Jan. 22, 2013)', which the court found does not exist; Westlaw link led to an unrelated Hopwood opinion. Outcome: Warning.
Why does Jayroe v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Warning in N.D. Texas, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Jayroe v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Jayroe v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Johnson v. Digital Federal Credit UnionN.D. Texas · Dec 30, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Shawn Olali v. Ampex Brands, LLCN.D. Texas · Feb 23, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Ezenwa Ebem v. Bondi et al.N.D. Texas · Sep 15, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Hartmann v. DavidsonN.D. Texas · Mar 12, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Allen v. AmazonN.D. Texas · Dec 23, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Garibay-Robledo v. NoemN.D. Texas · Jan 9, 2026same court · fake citations + trial

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Record details

TexasSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtN.D. Texas

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit5th Circuit

DateOct 27, 2025

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeWarning

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Ortiz v. General Motors Corp., 2008 WL 2620736 (N.D. Tex. June 30, 2008)', which the court identified as a problematic, non-existent authority.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Cowart v. AVIK Services, No. 3:19-CV-00101, 2019 WL 1745988 (S.D. Tex. 2019)', another citation the court deemed non-existent or AI-generated.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Jayroe v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company?

Why does Jayroe v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company matter for legal AI risk?

What does the public record establish about Jayroe v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company?

Which source supports this Jayroe v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.