Back to case record
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
CASE BRIEF / REVIEW PACKETAV-CB-0K69HBIGenerated September 11, 2026Evidence checked Sep 10, 2026
TRACKED PUBLIC MATTER

Johnson v. Florida Department of Juvenile Justice et al

M.D. Florida · Feb 19, 2026

Jurisdiction
federal
Court
M.D. Florida
Record ID
johnson-v-florida-department-of-juvenile-justice-et-al-2026-02-19
Observed outcome
The court struck the plaintiff's response to the defendants' motions for summary judgment due to the inclusion of hallucinated case law.
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
ADVISOR READOUT

Why this matter warrants attention

The court struck the plaintiff's response to the defendants' motions for summary judgment because it contained citations to non-existent case law. The court granted the plaintiff leave to refile the response with accurate citations, which the plaintiff subsequently performed.

Why the decision-maker cared

Fabricated: Case Law | Watson v. Amedisys Holding, LLC, 298 F. App'x 395, 396 (5th Cir. 2008) || Fabricated: Case Law | Martin v. Dep't of Corrections, 682 So. 2d 331, 333 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)

Why it matters now

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in M.D. Florida, with the listed outcome: Brief Struck.

RECORDED ISSUES

Failure modes and consequences

  • Hallucinated_case_law
  • Pro Se
  • Fake Citations
  • Civil Rights
  • Trial
  • Struck Filing
AI attribution
Implied
Recorded tool
AI (implied, unspecified)
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
Procedural posture
The court struck the plaintiff's response to the defendants' motions for summary judgment and granted leave to refile.
PRIMARY SOURCE

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open underlying source

A recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

What this record does—and does not—establish

The court identified the citations as hallucinated, implying the use of an AI tool.

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).

PRACTICAL REVIEW IMPLICATIONS

Controls suggested by the public record

  1. Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.