HomeCasesJacob Barry Allston v. Ron DeSantis, et al.

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Jacob Barry Allston v. Ron DeSantis, et al.

M.D. Florida · Dec 4, 2025

FL / federalEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsfabricated quotescivil rights

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a purported Eleventh Circuit case 'United States v. Roses, 39 F.4th 113 (11th Cir. 2022)' which the Court found does not appear to be a real case. Outcome: Warning.

Why the court cared: Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a purported Eleventh Circuit case 'United States v. Roses, 39 F.4th 113 (11th Cir. 2022)' which the Court found does not appear to be a real case. || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed a quotation to Jackson v. Bank of Am. that the Court and opposing counsel showed does not appear in that decision. || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed a quote to Varnes v. Local 91 (674 F.2d 1365) that the Court found is not present in that case.
Why it matters now: This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in M.D. Florida, with the listed outcome: Warning.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in M.D. Florida, with the listed outcome: Warning.

Record details

FloridaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtM.D. Florida

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit11th Circuit

DateDec 4, 2025

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeWarning

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Warning

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a purported Eleventh Circuit case 'United States v. Roses, 39 F.4th 113 (11th Cir. 2022)' which the Court found does not appear to be a real case.
False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed a quotation to Jackson v. Bank of Am. that the Court and opposing counsel showed does not appear in that decision.
False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed a quote to Varnes v. Local 91 (674 F.2d 1365) that the Court found is not present in that case.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Jacob Barry Allston v. Ron DeSantis, et al.?: Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a purported Eleventh Circuit case 'United States v. Roses, 39 F.4th 113 (11th Cir. 2022)' which the Court found does not appear to be a real case. Outcome: Warning.
Why does Jacob Barry Allston v. Ron DeSantis, et al. matter for legal AI risk?: This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in M.D. Florida, with the listed outcome: Warning.
What does the public record establish about Jacob Barry Allston v. Ron DeSantis, et al.?: Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this Jacob Barry Allston v. Ron DeSantis, et al. summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Charles C. Force v. Capital One, N.A., et al.M.D. Florida · Oct 15, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Julia Rose v. Arts Bonita, Inc., et al.M.D. Florida · Jul 12, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Stringer v. White Cap Supply Holdings, LLCM.D. Florida · May 14, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Johnson v. Florida Department of Juvenile Justice et alM.D. Florida · Feb 19, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Farag v. Persante et alM.D. Florida · Jan 26, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Peter J. Allsot v. Naseem LatifM.D. Florida · Jan 20, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in M.D. Florida, with the listed outcome: Warning.

Record details

FloridaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtM.D. Florida

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit11th Circuit

DateDec 4, 2025

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeWarning

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a purported Eleventh Circuit case 'United States v. Roses, 39 F.4th 113 (11th Cir. 2022)' which the Court found does not appear to be a real case.

False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed a quotation to Jackson v. Bank of Am. that the Court and opposing counsel showed does not appear in that decision.

False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed a quote to Varnes v. Local 91 (674 F.2d 1365) that the Court found is not present in that case.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Jacob Barry Allston v. Ron DeSantis, et al.?

Why does Jacob Barry Allston v. Ron DeSantis, et al. matter for legal AI risk?

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in M.D. Florida, with the listed outcome: Warning.

What does the public record establish about Jacob Barry Allston v. Ron DeSantis, et al.?

Which source supports this Jacob Barry Allston v. Ron DeSantis, et al. summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.