Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Johnson v. Florida Department of Juvenile Justice et al
M.D. Florida · Feb 19, 2026
FL / federalEditorial impact: mediumpro sefake citationscivil rightstrial
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
In a federal civil-rights case, the court noted that an earlier response contained citations to authorities that did not exist, granted leave to refile that response with proper citations, and proceeded to resolve the parties' remaining claims and defenses.
- Why the court cared
- Fabricated: Case Law | Watson v. Amedisys Holding, LLC, 298 F. App'x 395, 396 (5th Cir. 2008) || Fabricated: Case Law | Martin v. Dep't of Corrections, 682 So. 2d 331, 333 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)
- Why it matters now
- This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in M.D. Florida, with the listed outcome: Brief Struck.
Why this matter is tracked
In a federal civil-rights case, the court noted that an earlier response contained citations to authorities that did not exist, granted leave to refile that response with proper citations, and proceeded to resolve the parties' remaining claims and defenses.
Operational lesson
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in M.D. Florida, with the listed outcome: Brief Struck.
Record details
FloridaSingle-state evidence scope
CourtM.D. Florida
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit11th Circuit
DateFeb 19, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeBrief Struck
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Brief Struck
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Watson v. Amedisys Holding, LLC, 298 F. App'x 395, 396 (5th Cir. 2008)
- Fabricated: Case Law | Martin v. Dep't of Corrections, 682 So. 2d 331, 333 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Johnson v. Florida Department of Juvenile Justice et al?
- In a federal civil-rights case, the court noted that an earlier response contained citations to authorities that did not exist, granted leave to refile that response with proper citations, and proceeded to resolve the parties' remaining claims and defenses.
- Why does Johnson v. Florida Department of Juvenile Justice et al matter for legal AI risk?
- This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in M.D. Florida, with the listed outcome: Brief Struck.
- What does the public record establish about Johnson v. Florida Department of Juvenile Justice et al?
- Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
- Which source supports this Johnson v. Florida Department of Juvenile Justice et al summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.