Kid International, LLC v. City National Bank of Florida
CA Florida (4d) · Oct 7, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- state
- Court
- CA Florida (4d)
- Record ID
- kid-international-llc-v-city-national-bank-of-florida-2026-10-07
- Observed outcome
- Adverse Costs Order
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
Fabricated: Case Law | The brief cited Ogilvie v. Sebring Airport Authority seven times, but the cited case does not exist; it also included a fictional quotation from it. The court disregarded the citation and quotation. Outcome: Adverse Costs Order.
The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records Adverse Costs Order. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Adverse Costs Order in CA Florida (4d). It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Fabricated Quotes
- Misrepresented Authority
- Other
- Appellate
- AI attribution
- Not Established
- Recorded tool
- Unidentified
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Adverse Costs Order
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
- Compare every quoted passage and pincite directly with the underlying opinion or filing.
- Confirm that each authority supports the stated proposition and has not been mischaracterized.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.