AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK
AI visibilityConsultingSearch free
Public trackerCorpus refreshed Aug 15, 2026 · Latest decision Aug 11, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesRose Lannquist Gouldy v. Timothy M. Chiasson, et al.
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

Rose Lannquist Gouldy v. Timothy M. Chiasson, et al.

CA Florida (4d) · Jul 22, 2026

FL / stateEditorial impact: mediumpro sefake citationsfabricated quotestortBar ReferralOrdered To Show Cause
Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Cited a nonexistent case as authority: 'Barton v. McGovern, 302 So. 3d 1042 (Fla. 2d DCA 2020)'. Court identified the citation as phantom. Outcome: Order to show cause to consider barring the pro se litigant from future filings.

Why the court cared
The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records Order to show cause to consider barring the pro se litigant from future filings. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Order to show cause to consider barring the pro se litigant from future filings in CA Florida (4d). It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Cited a nonexistent case as authority: 'Barton v. McGovern, 302 So. 3d 1042 (Fla. 2d DCA 2020)'. Court identified the citation as phantom. Outcome: Order to show cause to consider barring the pro se litigant from future filings.

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Order to show cause to consider barring the pro se litigant from future filings in CA Florida (4d). It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

FloridaSingle-state evidence scope
Explore FLOpen its source-linked jurisdiction page and related matters.
CourtCA Florida (4d)
Jurisdictionstate
Circuit11th Circuit
DateJul 22, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeOrder to show cause to consider barring the pro se litigant from future filings
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Order to show cause to consider barring the pro se litigant from future filings

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Fabricated: Case Law | Cited a nonexistent case as authority: 'Barton v. McGovern, 302 So. 3d 1042 (Fla. 2d DCA 2020)'. Court identified the citation as phantom.
  2. False Quotes: Case Law | Attributed a quotation to an actual Barton decision that does not contain the quoted language; court noted the real case is Barton v. McGovern, 504 So. 2d 457 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987) and that the quoted passage is fabricated.
  3. False Quotes: Case Law | Quoted a purported passage from Stockman v. Downs (573 So. 2d 835) that the opinion identifies as a fabricated quotation used to support Gouldy's argument.
  4. Fabricated: Case Law | Multiple other phantom authorities and fabricated quotations from Florida cases peppered throughout the brief; court treated these as fabricated case law and sanctionable phantom authority.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Rose Lannquist Gouldy v. Timothy M. Chiasson, et al.?
Fabricated: Case Law | Cited a nonexistent case as authority: 'Barton v. McGovern, 302 So. 3d 1042 (Fla. 2d DCA 2020)'. Court identified the citation as phantom. Outcome: Order to show cause to consider barring the pro se litigant from future filings.
Why does Rose Lannquist Gouldy v. Timothy M. Chiasson, et al. matter for legal AI risk?
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Order to show cause to consider barring the pro se litigant from future filings in CA Florida (4d). It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Rose Lannquist Gouldy v. Timothy M. Chiasson, et al.?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded link is a secondary public source and should be checked against the docket where available. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Rose Lannquist Gouldy v. Timothy M. Chiasson, et al. summary?
The recorded source is reason.com. It is classified as secondary or other linked source; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Eclectic Synergy, LLC v. SeredinCA Florida (4d) · May 27, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotesInnocent v. Meraki Installers, LLCCA Florida (4d) · May 27, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotesGoya v. HayashidaCA Florida (4d) · Aug 13, 2025same court · pro se + fake citationsRobert Hinton Avery v. Danielle BeauzilCA Florida (4d) · May 27, 2026same court · pro se + fake citationsChristopher Gleason v. Julie MarcusCA Florida (2d) · May 13, 2026same jurisdiction · pro se + fake citationsMatthew Merz v. Harlyn Jenkins, Jillane Baros, Melinda Finn‑KamerathCA Washington · Jun 15, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)