Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 27, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 24, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It remains available for research but is excluded from search indexing until its documented evidence gaps are resolved.
Rose Lannquist Gouldy v. Timothy M. Chiasson, et al.
CA Florida (4d) · Jul 22, 2026
FL / stateEditorial impact: mediumpro sefake citationsfabricated quotestort
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Cited a nonexistent case as authority: 'Barton v. McGovern, 302 So. 3d 1042 (Fla. 2d DCA 2020)'. Court identified the citation as phantom. Outcome: Order to show cause to consider barring the pro se litigant from future filings.
- Why the court cared
- The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records Order to show cause to consider barring the pro se litigant from future filings. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Order to show cause to consider barring the pro se litigant from future filings in CA Florida (4d). It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Cited a nonexistent case as authority: 'Barton v. McGovern, 302 So. 3d 1042 (Fla. 2d DCA 2020)'. Court identified the citation as phantom. Outcome: Order to show cause to consider barring the pro se litigant from future filings.
Operational lesson
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Order to show cause to consider barring the pro se litigant from future filings in CA Florida (4d). It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
FloridaSingle-state evidence scope
CourtCA Florida (4d)
Jurisdictionstate
Circuit11th Circuit
DateJul 22, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeOrder to show cause to consider barring the pro se litigant from future filings
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Order to show cause to consider barring the pro se litigant from future filings
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Cited a nonexistent case as authority: 'Barton v. McGovern, 302 So. 3d 1042 (Fla. 2d DCA 2020)'. Court identified the citation as phantom.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Attributed a quotation to an actual Barton decision that does not contain the quoted language; court noted the real case is Barton v. McGovern, 504 So. 2d 457 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987) and that the quoted passage is fabricated.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Quoted a purported passage from Stockman v. Downs (573 So. 2d 835) that the opinion identifies as a fabricated quotation used to support Gouldy's argument.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Multiple other phantom authorities and fabricated quotations from Florida cases peppered throughout the brief; court treated these as fabricated case law and sanctionable phantom authority.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Rose Lannquist Gouldy v. Timothy M. Chiasson, et al.?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Cited a nonexistent case as authority: 'Barton v. McGovern, 302 So. 3d 1042 (Fla. 2d DCA 2020)'. Court identified the citation as phantom. Outcome: Order to show cause to consider barring the pro se litigant from future filings.
- Why does Rose Lannquist Gouldy v. Timothy M. Chiasson, et al. matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Order to show cause to consider barring the pro se litigant from future filings in CA Florida (4d). It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about Rose Lannquist Gouldy v. Timothy M. Chiasson, et al.?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded link is a secondary public source and should be checked against the docket where available. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Rose Lannquist Gouldy v. Timothy M. Chiasson, et al. summary?
- The recorded source is reason.com. It is classified as secondary or other linked source; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.