HomeCasesRobert Hinton Avery v. Danielle Beauzil

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Robert Hinton Avery v. Danielle Beauzil

CA Florida (4d) · May 27, 2026

FL / stateEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsmisrepresented authoritydisqualification

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Legal Norm | Previously filed an emergency pleading that cited a non-existent rule of procedure (prior warning referenced by the court) — example of fabricated authority. Outcome: Barred from filing save with Counsel.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Barred from filing save with Counsel; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving Unidentified with Barred from filing save with Counsel in CA Florida (4d), making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving Unidentified with Barred from filing save with Counsel in CA Florida (4d), making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

FloridaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtCA Florida (4d)

Jurisdictionstate

Circuit11th Circuit

DateMay 27, 2026

AI toolUnidentified

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeBarred from filing save with Counsel

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

Barred from filing save with Counsel

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Legal Norm | Previously filed an emergency pleading that cited a non-existent rule of procedure (prior warning referenced by the court) — example of fabricated authority.
Misrepresented: Case Law | Argued that orders entered by a disqualified judge are void and must be vacated; cited Fischer v. Knuck and MacKenzie, but the court found the citations do not support that proposition.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Robert Hinton Avery v. Danielle Beauzil?: Fabricated: Legal Norm | Previously filed an emergency pleading that cited a non-existent rule of procedure (prior warning referenced by the court) — example of fabricated authority. Outcome: Barred from filing save with Counsel.
Why does Robert Hinton Avery v. Danielle Beauzil matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving Unidentified with Barred from filing save with Counsel in CA Florida (4d), making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Robert Hinton Avery v. Danielle Beauzil?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Robert Hinton Avery v. Danielle Beauzil summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Eclectic Synergy, LLC v. SeredinCA Florida (4d) · May 27, 2026same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority Goya v. HayashidaCA Florida (4d) · Aug 13, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Jaime Alexander Davidson v. Nayeli Nadir Chang-WarnerCA Florida (6d) · Jun 26, 2026same jurisdiction · pro se + fake citations Hessert v. Hessert & Wieland-PulayyaCA Florida (6d) · Mar 20, 2026same jurisdiction · pro se + fake citations Barari v. BurgessCA Arizona (1d) · Jun 26, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: Unidentified Robert S. Hulvat v. Juli Gumina, STG Divorce Law, and Jennifer B. HulvatCA Illinois (3d) · Apr 9, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: Unidentified

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Record details

FloridaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtCA Florida (4d)

Jurisdictionstate

Circuit11th Circuit

DateMay 27, 2026

AI toolUnidentified

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeBarred from filing save with Counsel

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Legal Norm | Previously filed an emergency pleading that cited a non-existent rule of procedure (prior warning referenced by the court) — example of fabricated authority.

Misrepresented: Case Law | Argued that orders entered by a disqualified judge are void and must be vacated; cited Fischer v. Knuck and MacKenzie, but the court found the citations do not support that proposition.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Robert Hinton Avery v. Danielle Beauzil?

Why does Robert Hinton Avery v. Danielle Beauzil matter for legal AI risk?

What does the public record establish about Robert Hinton Avery v. Danielle Beauzil?

Which source supports this Robert Hinton Avery v. Danielle Beauzil summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.