Kleyman Law Group, P.C. v. Kaloidis
SC New York · Aug 4, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- state
- Court
- SC New York
- Record ID
- kleyman-law-group-p-c-v-kaloidis-2026-08-04
- Observed outcome
- Monetary Sanction; Bar Referral
- Known monetary consequence
- $46,511
Why this matter warrants attention
Fabricated: Case Law | Submitted 23 fictitious decisions across 19 submissions; court concluded these were fabricated AI-generated authorities and constituted frivolous conduct. Outcome: Monetary Sanction; Bar Referral.
The structured public record identifies fake citations and fabricated quotes and records Monetary Sanction; Bar Referral. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Monetary Sanction; Bar Referral in SC New York. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fake Citations
- Fabricated Quotes
- Misrepresented Authority
- Bar Referral
- Contract
- Trial
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- Claude and other generative AI platforms
- Known monetary consequence
- $46,511
- Procedural posture
- Monetary Sanction; Bar Referral
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
Claude and other generative AI platforms is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
- Compare every quoted passage and pincite directly with the underlying opinion or filing.
- Confirm that each authority supports the stated proposition and has not been mischaracterized.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.