AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK
AI visibilityConsultingSearch free
Public trackerCorpus refreshed Aug 19, 2026 · Latest decision Aug 18, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesKleyman Law Group, P.C. v. Kaloidis
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 86/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

Kleyman Law Group, P.C. v. Kaloidis

SC New York · Aug 4, 2026

NY / stateEditorial impact: highfake citationsfabricated quotesmisrepresented authoritybar referralMonetaryBar Referral
Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Submitted 23 fictitious decisions across 19 submissions; court concluded these were fabricated AI-generated authorities and constituted frivolous conduct. Outcome: Monetary Sanction; Bar Referral.

Why the court cared
The structured public record identifies fake citations and fabricated quotes and records Monetary Sanction; Bar Referral. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now
This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Monetary Sanction; Bar Referral in SC New York. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Submitted 23 fictitious decisions across 19 submissions; court concluded these were fabricated AI-generated authorities and constituted frivolous conduct. Outcome: Monetary Sanction; Bar Referral.

Operational lesson

This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Monetary Sanction; Bar Referral in SC New York. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

New YorkSingle-state evidence scope
Explore NYOpen its source-linked jurisdiction page and related matters.
CourtSC New York
Jurisdictionstate
Circuit2nd Circuit
DateAug 4, 2026
CL
AI toolClaude and other generative AI platforms
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeMonetary Sanction; Bar Referral
Known amount$46,511
Professional sanctionYes
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

Claude and other generative AI platforms is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Monetary Sanction; Bar Referral

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Fabricated: Case Law | Submitted 23 fictitious decisions across 19 submissions; court concluded these were fabricated AI-generated authorities and constituted frivolous conduct.
  2. Misrepresented: Case Law | Materially misstated holdings of at least 83 genuine decisions across multiple filings; court found these misrepresentations extensive and non-trivial.
  3. False Quotes: Case Law | Included multiple fictitious quotations and fabricated excerpts in filings; court treated fake quotations as aggravating evidence of AI hallucination misuse.
  4. Fabricated: Case Law | Created and submitted additional fabricated authorities after opposing counsel identified the problem, exacerbating the misconduct.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Kleyman Law Group, P.C. v. Kaloidis?
Fabricated: Case Law | Submitted 23 fictitious decisions across 19 submissions; court concluded these were fabricated AI-generated authorities and constituted frivolous conduct. Outcome: Monetary Sanction; Bar Referral.
Why does Kleyman Law Group, P.C. v. Kaloidis matter for legal AI risk?
This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Monetary Sanction; Bar Referral in SC New York. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Kleyman Law Group, P.C. v. Kaloidis?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Kleyman Law Group, P.C. v. Kaloidis summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Sharei Torah v. HendelSC New York · Jun 1, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotesEllen Michaelis v. Wilmington Savings Fund SocietySC New York · Apr 3, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotesFora Financial Asset Securitization v. Teona Ostrov Public RelationsSC New York · Jan 24, 2025same court · fake citations + fabricated quotesBrown v. Real Estate Capital of America et al.SC New York · Aug 7, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotesStrategic Funding Source, Inc. v. STI-NY, LLCSC New York · May 28, 2026same court · fake citations + misrepresented authorityKeefe v. BMakin Film LtdSC New York · Apr 24, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes