HomeCasesEllen Michaelis v. Wilmington Savings Fund Society

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 80/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Ellen Michaelis v. Wilmington Savings Fund Society

SC New York · Apr 3, 2026

NY / stateEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsfabricated quotesmisrepresented authority

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributes the statement "A void decree is open to collateral attack at any time." to Matter of Sakow (97 NY2d 436), but the quoted language does not appear in that case; court identified this as a false quotation.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is the response recorded in the linked source; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving Unidentified with a recorded judicial response in SC New York, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving Unidentified with a recorded judicial response in SC New York, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

New YorkSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtSC New York

Jurisdictionstate

Circuit2nd Circuit

DateApr 3, 2026

AI toolUnidentified

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeSee source

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributes the statement "A void decree is open to collateral attack at any time." to Matter of Sakow (97 NY2d 436), but the quoted language does not appear in that case; court identified this as a false quotation.
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cites "Kruger v. Kruger, 107 AD3d 1285, 1287 [3d Dept. 2013]", a case that does not exist; the reporter citation corresponds to Matter of Blocker v. Fischer, 107 AD3d 1285.
Misrepresented: Case Law | Court found that numerous additional citations in Plaintiff's affirmation were fabricated or misrepresented by GenAI, pointing to different cases, irrelevant cases, or no case at all.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Ellen Michaelis v. Wilmington Savings Fund Society?: False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributes the statement "A void decree is open to collateral attack at any time." to Matter of Sakow (97 NY2d 436), but the quoted language does not appear in that case; court identified this as a false quotation.
Why does Ellen Michaelis v. Wilmington Savings Fund Society matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving Unidentified with a recorded judicial response in SC New York, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Ellen Michaelis v. Wilmington Savings Fund Society?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Ellen Michaelis v. Wilmington Savings Fund Society summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Sharei Torah v. HendelSC New York · Jun 1, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Keefe v. BMakin Film LtdSC New York · Apr 24, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Hilpert v. 16 Judge SPV LLCSC New York · Dec 4, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Fora Financial Asset Securitization v. Teona Ostrov Public RelationsSC New York · Jan 24, 2025same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes Strategic Funding Source, Inc. v. STI-NY, LLCSC New York · May 28, 2026same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority Deutsche Bank National Bank v. Jean LeTennierSC New York · Jan 8, 2026same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cites "Kruger v. Kruger, 107 AD3d 1285, 1287 [3d Dept. 2013]", a case that does not exist; the reporter citation corresponds to Matter of Blocker v. Fischer, 107 AD3d 1285.

Misrepresented: Case Law | Court found that numerous additional citations in Plaintiff's affirmation were fabricated or misrepresented by GenAI, pointing to different cases, irrelevant cases, or no case at all.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Ellen Michaelis v. Wilmington Savings Fund Society?

Why does Ellen Michaelis v. Wilmington Savings Fund Society matter for legal AI risk?

What does the public record establish about Ellen Michaelis v. Wilmington Savings Fund Society?

Which source supports this Ellen Michaelis v. Wilmington Savings Fund Society summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.