Lisandrillo v. Palozzi
CA Florida (4d) · Sep 16, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- State
- Court
- CA Florida (4d)
- Record ID
- lisandrillo-v-palozzi-2026-09-16
- Observed outcome
- Petition denied on 16 Sep 2026 with an order to show cause; on 21 Oct 2026 the court found counsel's 82-page response missed the point and referred counsel to the Florida Bar (no monetary sanction)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
Misrepresented: Legal Norm | The filing asserted that a motion to disqualify automatically stayed all trial-court proceedings. The court characterized this as a recurring AI-hallucinated argument and held that the assertion was legally mistaken. Outcome: Petition denied on 16 Sep 2026 with an order to show cause; on 21 Oct 2026 the court found counsel's 82-page response missed the point and referred counsel to the Florida Bar (no monetary sanction).
The structured public record identifies fabricated quotes and misrepresented authority and records Petition denied on 16 Sep 2026 with an order to show cause; on 21 Oct 2026 the court found counsel's 82-page response missed the point and referred counsel to the Florida Bar (no monetary sanction). The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
This matter connects fabricated quotes and misrepresented authority with Petition denied on 16 Sep 2026 with an order to show cause; on 21 Oct 2026 the court found counsel's 82-page response missed the point and referred counsel to the Florida Bar (no monetary sanction) in CA Florida (4d). It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fabricated Quotes
- Misrepresented Authority
- Published Opinion
- Disqualification
- Family
- Appellate
- AI attribution
- Not Established
- Recorded tool
- Unidentified
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Petition denied on 16 Sep 2026 with an order to show cause; on 21 Oct 2026 the court found counsel's 82-page response missed the point and referred counsel to the Florida Bar (no monetary sanction)
CourtListener / RECAP
Docket or legal-document mirror. The recorded link is hosted by a legal document repository or mirror.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded link is a secondary public source and should be checked against the docket where available. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Controls suggested by the public record
- Compare every quoted passage and pincite directly with the underlying opinion or filing.
- Confirm that each authority supports the stated proposition and has not been mischaracterized.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.