Lisandrillo v. Palozzi
Fla. 4th DCA · Sep 16, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- state
- Court
- Fla. 4th DCA
- Record ID
- lisandrillo-v-palozzi-2026-09-16
- Observed outcome
- Petition denied; counsel ordered to show cause, without using AI, why sanctions including possible Florida Bar referral should not be imposed.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
Misrepresented: Legal Norm | The filing asserted that a motion to disqualify automatically stayed all trial-court proceedings. The court characterized this as a recurring AI-hallucinated argument and held that the assertion was legally mistaken. Outcome: Petition denied; counsel ordered to show cause, without using AI, why sanctions including possible Florida Bar referral should not be imposed.. The court found that counsel’s filings appeared to contain AI-generated components, including convoluted and frivolous arguments, alleged events contrary to the official record, and legal gibberish. The court expressly noted that the cited cases were real and that the matter did not involve hallucinated law or false legal citations. It rejected the petition and disqualification motion, emphasizing that a judge cannot be disqualified based on AI-hallucinated events or allegations contradicted by the record. Counsel was ordered to show cause within ten days, without using AI, why sanctions or referral to the Florida Bar should not follow.
The structured public record identifies fabricated quotes and misrepresented authority and records Petition denied; counsel ordered to show cause, without using AI, why sanctions including possible Florida Bar referral should not be imposed.. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
This matter connects fabricated quotes and misrepresented authority with Petition denied; counsel ordered to show cause, without using AI, why sanctions including possible Florida Bar referral should not be imposed. in Fla. 4th DCA. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fabricated Quotes
- Misrepresented Authority
- Bar Referral
- Published Opinion
- Disqualification
- Trial
- AI attribution
- Not Established
- Recorded tool
- Unidentified
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Petition denied; counsel ordered to show cause, without using AI, why sanctions including possible Florida Bar referral should not be imposed.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Controls suggested by the public record
- Compare every quoted passage and pincite directly with the underlying opinion or filing.
- Confirm that each authority supports the stated proposition and has not been mischaracterized.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.