Back to case record
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
CASE BRIEF / REVIEW PACKETAV-CB-0HXGAD6Generated September 11, 2026Evidence checked Sep 10, 2026
TRACKED PUBLIC MATTER

Mag 7 Ltd. et al. v. Tederi et al.

District Court, Tel Aviv-Yafo · Dec 25, 2025

Jurisdiction
international
Court
District Court, Tel Aviv-Yafo
Record ID
mag-7-ltd-et-al-v-tederi-et-al-2025-12-25
Observed outcome
The court ordered the respondents to delete the passages containing fabricated citations, prohibited further amendments, and imposed a 10,000 ILS monetary sanction.
Known monetary consequence
₪10,000
ADVISOR READOUT

Why this matter warrants attention

The Tel Aviv District Court sanctioned the respondents for including AI-generated fabricated citations in their pleadings. The court ordered the immediate removal of the offending passages, barred further amendments, and imposed a total monetary penalty of 10,000 ILS, payable to the state and the opposing party.

Why the decision-maker cared

Fabricated: Case Law

Why it matters now

Tel Aviv District now hits attorneys with 10K ILS and forced repleading for a single fabricated citation.

RECORDED ISSUES

Failure modes and consequences

  • Fake Citations
  • Contract
  • Trial
  • Monetary
AI attribution
Implied
Recorded tool
AI (unspecified)
Known monetary consequence
₪10,000
Procedural posture
Post-filing motion regarding the content of the respondents' answer, resolved by court order prior to the scheduled hearing.
PRIMARY SOURCE

law.co.il

Secondary or other linked source. The recorded link is not classified as an official court source or docket mirror.

Open underlying source

A recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

What this record does—and does not—establish

Court refers to authorities as having origins in artificial intelligence.

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).

PRACTICAL REVIEW IMPLICATIONS

Controls suggested by the public record

  1. Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.
  2. Retain a matter-level record of source checks and corrections.