Brown v. Real Estate Capital of America et al.
Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0), which credits Jesse Schaefer; document hosted in his archive: open the upstream document. What AI Vortex adds.
SC New York · Aug 7, 2026
What happened in this matter?
False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiffs' opposition contains a quotation attributed to a cited case that does not appear in that case; movants allege the passage was fabricated (likely by generative AI) and used to support an argument. Outcome: No sanctions.
- Why the court cared
- The structured public record identifies fabricated quotes and contract and records No sanctions. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects fabricated quotes and contract with No sanctions in SC New York. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiffs' opposition contains a quotation attributed to a cited case that does not appear in that case; movants allege the passage was fabricated (likely by generative AI) and used to support an argument. Outcome: No sanctions.
This matter connects fabricated quotes and contract with No sanctions in SC New York. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
Corrected 2026-10-30: see the corrections log.
What the record establishes about AI use
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
No sanctions
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiffs' opposition contains a quotation attributed to a cited case that does not appear in that case; movants allege the passage was fabricated (likely by generative AI) and used to support an argument.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Brown v. Real Estate Capital of America et al.?
- False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiffs' opposition contains a quotation attributed to a cited case that does not appear in that case; movants allege the passage was fabricated (likely by generative AI) and used to support an argument. Outcome: No sanctions.
- Why does Brown v. Real Estate Capital of America et al. matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects fabricated quotes and contract with No sanctions in SC New York. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about Brown v. Real Estate Capital of America et al.?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Brown v. Real Estate Capital of America et al. summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases
One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.