Which source supports this Brown v. Real Estate Capital of America et al. summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

HomeCasesBrown v. Real Estate Capital of America et al.

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.

Corpus matter record

Brown v. Real Estate Capital of America et al.

SC New York · Aug 7, 2026

NY / state Editorial impact: low fake citations fabricated quotes contract trial None Adjudicated

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiffs' opposition contains a quotation attributed to a cited case that does not appear in that case; movants allege the passage was fabricated (likely by generative AI) and used to support an argument. Outcome: No sanctions.

Why the court cared: The structured public record identifies fake citations and fabricated quotes and records No sanctions. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now: This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with No sanctions in SC New York. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with No sanctions in SC New York. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

New YorkSingle-state evidence scope

Explore NYOpen its source-linked jurisdiction page and related matters.

CourtSC New York

Jurisdictionstate

Circuit2nd Circuit

DateAug 7, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeNo sanctions

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

No sanctions

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiffs' opposition contains a quotation attributed to a cited case that does not appear in that case; movants allege the passage was fabricated (likely by generative AI) and used to support an argument.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Brown v. Real Estate Capital of America et al.?: False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiffs' opposition contains a quotation attributed to a cited case that does not appear in that case; movants allege the passage was fabricated (likely by generative AI) and used to support an argument. Outcome: No sanctions.
Why does Brown v. Real Estate Capital of America et al. matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with No sanctions in SC New York. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Brown v. Real Estate Capital of America et al.?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Brown v. Real Estate Capital of America et al. summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Sharei Torah v. HendelSC New York · Jun 1, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes Hilpert v. 16 Judge SPV LLCSC New York · Dec 4, 2025same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes Fora Financial Asset Securitization v. Teona Ostrov Public RelationsSC New York · Jan 24, 2025same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes Ellen Michaelis v. Wilmington Savings Fund SocietySC New York · Apr 3, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes Grymes Development Company v. FoderaSC New York · Nov 10, 2025same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes Drip Capital, Inc. v. SGM Socher Inc.SC New York · May 1, 2026same court · fake citations + contract

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source Suggest a correction to this record

Public-record statuspublic record, not an allegation-only entry

Indexing eligibilitypublicly indexable with evidence status disclosed

Published and maintained byManu Ayala · AI VortexIndependent legal AI risk intelligence

Corpus snapshot checked Aug 16, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Aug 16, 2026; latest tracked decision Aug 13, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Open SC New York profile Explore jurisdiction

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology