HomeCasesMag 7 Ltd. et al. v. Tederi et al.

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 90/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Mag 7 Ltd. et al. v. Tederi et al.

District Court, Tel Aviv-Yafo · Dec 25, 2025

IsraelEditorial impact: mediumfake citationscontracttrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

In Mag 7 Ltd. et al. v. Tederi et al., the Tel Aviv District Court allowed the respondents to amend their answer only by removing the marked passages alleged to contain fictitious AI-generated authorities. The court treated the deleted version as the operative pleading, barred additional changes without permission, and ordered NIS 5,000 in costs to the state plus NIS 5,000 to the applicants.

Why the court cared: Fabricated: Case Law
Why it matters now: Tel Aviv District now hits attorneys with 10K ILS and forced repleading for a single fabricated citation.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Tel Aviv District now hits attorneys with 10K ILS and forced repleading for a single fabricated citation.

Record details

CourtDistrict Court, Tel Aviv-Yafo

Jurisdictioninternational

CircuitNot recorded

DateDec 25, 2025

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeMonetary Sanction; Order to amend pleading

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Monetary Sanction; Order to amend pleading

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law

Questions this record answers

What happened in Mag 7 Ltd. et al. v. Tederi et al.?: In Mag 7 Ltd. et al. v. Tederi et al., the Tel Aviv District Court allowed the respondents to amend their answer only by removing the marked passages alleged to contain fictitious AI-generated authorities. The court treated the deleted version as the operative pleading, barred additional changes without permission, and ordered NIS 5,000 in costs to the state plus NIS 5,000 to the applicants.
Why does Mag 7 Ltd. et al. v. Tederi et al. matter for legal AI risk?: Tel Aviv District now hits attorneys with 10K ILS and forced repleading for a single fabricated citation.
What does the public record establish about Mag 7 Ltd. et al. v. Tederi et al.?: Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this Mag 7 Ltd. et al. v. Tederi et al. summary?: The recorded source is law.co.il. It is classified as secondary or other linked source; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Cames et al. v. Lowe's Home CentersM.D. Florida · Jul 16, 2026fake citations + contract · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Paige Warthen v. Barclays Bank Delaware (Warthen I, II, III)D. Maryland · Jul 13, 2026fake citations + contract · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Burlingame v. Argo Private Client Group Ltd, et al.N.D. Ohio · Jul 8, 2026fake citations + contract · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)BFG Corporation v. Pierce RE Holdings et al.N.D. Illinois · Jun 30, 2026fake citations + contract · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Zhdanovich-Doty v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance CompanyN.D. California · Jun 22, 2026fake citations + contract · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)CIBC Mortgages Inc v Reina FloresManitoba C.A. · Jun 12, 2026fake citations + contract · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)

Linked evidence record

law.co.il

Secondary or other linked source
The recorded link is not classified as an official court source or docket mirror.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court

Evidence boundary

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Tel Aviv District now hits attorneys with 10K ILS and forced repleading for a single fabricated citation.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Mag 7 Ltd. et al. v. Tederi et al.?

Why does Mag 7 Ltd. et al. v. Tederi et al. matter for legal AI risk?

Tel Aviv District now hits attorneys with 10K ILS and forced repleading for a single fabricated citation.

What does the public record establish about Mag 7 Ltd. et al. v. Tederi et al.?

Which source supports this Mag 7 Ltd. et al. v. Tederi et al. summary?

The recorded source is law.co.il. It is classified as secondary or other linked source; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.