Mag 7 Ltd. et al. v. Tederi et al.
District Court, Tel Aviv-Yafo · Dec 25, 2025
What happened in this matter?
The Tel Aviv District Court sanctioned the respondents for including AI-generated fabricated citations in their pleadings. The court ordered the immediate removal of the offending passages, barred further amendments, and imposed a total monetary penalty of 10,000 ILS, payable to the state and the opposing party.
- Why the court cared
- Fabricated: Case Law
- Why it matters now
- Tel Aviv District now hits attorneys with 10K ILS and forced repleading for a single fabricated citation.
Why this matter is tracked
In Mag 7 Ltd. et al. v. Tederi et al., the Tel Aviv District Court addressed the submission of pleadings containing fictitious legal authorities attributed to artificial intelligence. Judge Yehudit Shevach noted that while standard procedure would require a formal motion to amend the pleading and a formal reprimand for the inclusion of fabricated citations, the court prioritized the scheduled hearing date. Consequently, the court permitted the respondents to amend their answer solely by deleting the passages containing the alleged AI-generated fabrications. The court prohibited further additions to the pleading and imposed a total monetary sanction of 10,000 ILS, split equally between the state treasury and the applicants, to be paid prior to the hearing.
Tel Aviv District now hits attorneys with 10K ILS and forced repleading for a single fabricated citation.
Record details
What the record establishes about AI use
Court refers to authorities as having origins in artificial intelligence.
Post-filing motion regarding the content of the respondents' answer, resolved by court order prior to the scheduled hearing.
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Mag 7 Ltd. et al. v. Tederi et al.?
- The Tel Aviv District Court sanctioned the respondents for including AI-generated fabricated citations in their pleadings. The court ordered the immediate removal of the offending passages, barred further amendments, and imposed a total monetary penalty of 10,000 ILS, payable to the state and the opposing party.
- Why does Mag 7 Ltd. et al. v. Tederi et al. matter for legal AI risk?
- Tel Aviv District now hits attorneys with 10K ILS and forced repleading for a single fabricated citation.
- What does the public record establish about Mag 7 Ltd. et al. v. Tederi et al.?
- Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
- Which source supports this Mag 7 Ltd. et al. v. Tederi et al. summary?
- The recorded source is law.co.il. It is classified as secondary or other linked source; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.