Ms F Green v Imprint Creative Print Solutions Limited
Employment Tribunal (Leeds) · Jan 12, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- international
- Court
- Employment Tribunal (Leeds)
- Record ID
- ms-f-green-v-imprint-creative-print-solutions-limited-2026-01-12
- Observed outcome
- The Tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal and detriment claims but upheld the claim for failure to make reasonable adjustments. The claimant's AI-generated authorities were disregarded.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
The Tribunal disregarded legal authorities submitted by the pro se claimant after she admitted they were AI-generated and the Tribunal confirmed they were non-existent. The Tribunal proceeded to adjudicate the underlying employment claims, dismissing the unfair dismissal and detriment claims while upholding the reasonable adjustments claim.
Fabricated: Case Law | Claimant submitted case law authorities in an email that could not be identified; claimant admitted they were AI-generated and the Tribunal found the authorities do not exist and should be disregarded.
Employment tribunals now disregard AI-sourced authorities wholesale—challenge the entire argument, not just the cites.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Employment
- Trial
- None Adjudicated
- AI attribution
- Admitted
- Recorded tool
- Unidentified
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Reserved judgment following a four-day hearing at the Leeds Employment Tribunal, with a separate remedy hearing to be scheduled.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The claimant admitted using AI, but the specific tool was not named.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.
- Escalate and correct a suspect filing promptly, with a documented response.