Natashah Al-Ali v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
E.D. Michigan · Jul 31, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Court
- E.D. Michigan
- Record ID
- natashah-al-ali-v-cvs-pharmacy-inc-2026-07-31
- Observed outcome
- Warning: the court overruled the plaintiff's objections, found 'factitious' citations in them, and warned her that even one such citation in future will not be tolerated (2026 WL 2211604, Part IV)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited "Cottman Transmission Sys., Inc. v. Metro. Pontiac GMC, Inc., 351 F. Supp. 2d 343, 347 (E.D. Pa. 2004)"; Court could not find such a case and noted the volume/citation actually refers to a different case. Outcome: Warning: the court overruled the plaintiff's objections, found 'factitious' citations in them, and warned her that even one such citation in future will not be tolerated (2026 WL 2211604, Part IV).
The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records Warning: the court overruled the plaintiff's objections, found 'factitious' citations in them, and warned her that even one such citation in future will not be tolerated (2026 WL 2211604, Part IV). The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Warning: the court overruled the plaintiff's objections, found 'factitious' citations in them, and warned her that even one such citation in future will not be tolerated (2026 WL 2211604, Part IV) in E.D. Michigan. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Fabricated Quotes
- Misrepresented Authority
- Employment
- Trial
- AI attribution
- Not Established
- Recorded tool
- No tool named in source
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Warning: the court overruled the plaintiff's objections, found 'factitious' citations in them, and warned her that even one such citation in future will not be tolerated (2026 WL 2211604, Part IV)
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
- Compare every quoted passage and pincite directly with the underlying opinion or filing.
- Confirm that each authority supports the stated proposition and has not been mischaracterized.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.