Nº 5734510-54.2025.8.09.0051
TJ Goiás · Feb 5, 2026
Short answer. Status: Warning: the Goiás court of appeal found the appellee's citation of a non-existent precedent breaches the duty of procedural loyalty and issued a warning, with a possible bad-faith fine only on repetition; none imposed (headnote item 7, PDF p. 2); amount: no amount stated. TJ Goiás, decision date on record February 5, 2026. As of November 14, 2026. Court source · Methodology
- Jurisdiction
- International
- Court
- TJ Goiás
- Record ID
- no-5734510-54-2025-8-09-0051-2026-02-05
- Observed outcome
- Warning: the Goiás court of appeal found the appellee's citation of a non-existent precedent breaches the duty of procedural loyalty and issued a warning, with a possible bad-faith fine only on repetition; none imposed (headnote item 7, PDF p. 2)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
Fabricated: Case Law | Contrarrazões cited a non-existent judgment 'autos nº 5236890-50.2021.8.09.0000'; court concluded it was likely generated by AI and not humanly verified. Outcome: Warning: the Goiás court of appeal found the appellee's citation of a non-existent precedent breaches the duty of procedural loyalty and issued a warning, with a possible bad-faith fine only on repetition; none imposed (headnote item 7, PDF p. 2).
The structured public record identifies fake citations and trial and records Warning: the Goiás court of appeal found the appellee's citation of a non-existent precedent breaches the duty of procedural loyalty and issued a warning, with a possible bad-faith fine only on repetition; none imposed (headnote item 7, PDF p. 2). The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
This matter connects fake citations and trial with Warning: the Goiás court of appeal found the appellee's citation of a non-existent precedent breaches the duty of procedural loyalty and issued a warning, with a possible bad-faith fine only on repetition; none imposed (headnote item 7, PDF p. 2) in TJ Goiás. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fake Citations
- Trial
- Warning
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Warning: the Goiás court of appeal found the appellee's citation of a non-existent precedent breaches the duty of procedural loyalty and issued a warning, with a possible bad-faith fine only on repetition; none imposed (headnote item 7, PDF p. 2)
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.