Which source supports this n. 5392928-50.2025.8.09.0051 summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

HomeCasesn. 5392928-50.2025.8.09.0051

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.

Corpus matter record

n. 5392928-50.2025.8.09.0051

TJ Goiás · Aug 18, 2025

Brazil Editorial impact: high fake citations bar referral contract trial Monetary Bar Referral

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Citation attributed to STJ in the agravo (not found on STJ site; treated as inauthentic). Outcome: Monetary Fine; Bar Referral.

Why the court cared: The structured public record identifies fake citations and bar referral and records Monetary Fine; Bar Referral. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now: This matter connects fake citations and bar referral with Monetary Fine; Bar Referral in TJ Goiás. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Citation attributed to STJ in the agravo (not found on STJ site; treated as inauthentic). Outcome: Monetary Fine; Bar Referral.

Operational lesson

This matter connects fake citations and bar referral with Monetary Fine; Bar Referral in TJ Goiás. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

CourtTJ Goiás

Jurisdictioninternational

CircuitNot recorded

DateAug 18, 2025

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeMonetary Fine; Bar Referral

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionYes

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Monetary Fine; Bar Referral

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

5 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Citation attributed to STJ in the agravo (not found on STJ site; treated as inauthentic).
Fabricated: Case Law | Citation attributed to STJ in the agravo (not found on STJ site; treated as inauthentic).
Fabricated: Case Law | Citation attributed to STJ in the agravo (not found on STJ site; treated as inauthentic).
Fabricated: Case Law | Additional citation mentioned in contrarrazões that the court could not verify on STJ site (treated as inauthentic).
Fabricated: Case Law | Additional citation mentioned in contrarrazões that the court could not verify on STJ site (treated as inauthentic).

Questions this record answers

What happened in n. 5392928-50.2025.8.09.0051?: Fabricated: Case Law | Citation attributed to STJ in the agravo (not found on STJ site; treated as inauthentic). Outcome: Monetary Fine; Bar Referral.
Why does n. 5392928-50.2025.8.09.0051 matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects fake citations and bar referral with Monetary Fine; Bar Referral in TJ Goiás. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about n. 5392928-50.2025.8.09.0051?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this n. 5392928-50.2025.8.09.0051 summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Krista C. Geddes v. LoanCare, LLC, et al.E.D. California · Apr 22, 2026fake citations + bar referral · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Ezequiel Cunha de Moura e outro v. Wallace de Moura SilvaTJ-RJ · Mar 30, 2026fake citations + bar referral · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Virgil v. Experian Information Solutions, et al.S.D. Indiana · Feb 12, 2026fake citations + bar referral · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Jason M. Hatfield, P.A. v. Tony Pirani and Pirani Law PAW.D. Arkansas · Dec 3, 2025fake citations + bar referral · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Keaau Development Partnership LLC v. LawrenceHawaii ICA · May 15, 2025fake citations + bar referral · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Nexgen Pathology Services Ltd v. Darcueil DuncanHigh Court of Justice · Apr 30, 2025fake citations + bar referral · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source Suggest a correction to this record

Public-record statuspublic record, not an allegation-only entry

Indexing eligibilitypublicly indexable with evidence status disclosed

Published and maintained byManu Ayala · AI VortexIndependent legal AI risk intelligence

Corpus snapshot checked Aug 16, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Aug 16, 2026; latest tracked decision Aug 13, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Open TJ Goiás profile Explore jurisdiction

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology