Public trackerCorpus refreshed Nov 14, 2026 · Latest decision Nov 8, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesn. 5392928-50.2025.8.09.0051
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

n. 5392928-50.2025.8.09.0051

Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0); document hosted in his archive: open the upstream document. What AI Vortex adds.

Cite this record

TJ Goiás · Aug 18, 2025

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Citation attributed to STJ in the agravo (not found on STJ site; treated as inauthentic). Outcome: Monetary Fine; Bar Referral.

Why the court cared
The structured public record identifies fake citations and bar referral and records Monetary Fine; Bar Referral. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now
This matter connects fake citations and bar referral with Monetary Fine; Bar Referral in TJ Goiás. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Citation attributed to STJ in the agravo (not found on STJ site; treated as inauthentic). Outcome: Monetary Fine; Bar Referral.

Operational lesson

This matter connects fake citations and bar referral with Monetary Fine; Bar Referral in TJ Goiás. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

CourtTJ Goiás
Jurisdictioninternational
CircuitNot recorded
DateAug 18, 2025
First seenAug 16, 2026 (in this dataset)
AI toolNo tool named in source
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeMonetary Fine; Bar Referral
Known amount2% (of the updated value of the cause; claim value not stated; not converted)
Professional sanctionYes

Corrected 2026-11-04: see the corrections log.

Amount read from the primary court record (2026-11-04): open the court record.

Verified from the record

TJGO, Agravo 5392928-50.2025.8.09.0051, 18 Aug 2025: "Condenar o agravante ao pagamento de multa de 2% sobre o valor atualizado da causa por litigância de má-fé"

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

Monetary Fine; Bar Referral

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

5 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Fabricated: Case Law | Citation attributed to STJ in the agravo (not found on STJ site; treated as inauthentic).
  2. Fabricated: Case Law | Citation attributed to STJ in the agravo (not found on STJ site; treated as inauthentic).
  3. Fabricated: Case Law | Citation attributed to STJ in the agravo (not found on STJ site; treated as inauthentic).
  4. Fabricated: Case Law | Additional citation mentioned in contrarrazões that the court could not verify on STJ site (treated as inauthentic).
  5. Fabricated: Case Law | Additional citation mentioned in contrarrazões that the court could not verify on STJ site (treated as inauthentic).

Questions this record answers

What happened in n. 5392928-50.2025.8.09.0051?
Fabricated: Case Law | Citation attributed to STJ in the agravo (not found on STJ site; treated as inauthentic). Outcome: Monetary Fine; Bar Referral.
Why does n. 5392928-50.2025.8.09.0051 matter for legal AI risk?
This matter connects fake citations and bar referral with Monetary Fine; Bar Referral in TJ Goiás. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about n. 5392928-50.2025.8.09.0051?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this n. 5392928-50.2025.8.09.0051 summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Weekly alert

Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases

One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.