Nº 5734510-54.2025.8.09.0051
Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0); document hosted in his archive: open the upstream document. What AI Vortex adds.
TJ Goiás · Feb 5, 2026
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Contrarrazões cited a non-existent judgment 'autos nº 5236890-50.2021.8.09.0000'; court concluded it was likely generated by AI and not humanly verified. Outcome: Warning: the Goiás court of appeal found the appellee's citation of a non-existent precedent breaches the duty of procedural loyalty and issued a warning, with a possible bad-faith fine only on repetition; none imposed (headnote item 7, PDF p. 2).
- Why the court cared
- The structured public record identifies fake citations and trial and records Warning: the Goiás court of appeal found the appellee's citation of a non-existent precedent breaches the duty of procedural loyalty and issued a warning, with a possible bad-faith fine only on repetition; none imposed (headnote item 7, PDF p. 2). The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects fake citations and trial with Warning: the Goiás court of appeal found the appellee's citation of a non-existent precedent breaches the duty of procedural loyalty and issued a warning, with a possible bad-faith fine only on repetition; none imposed (headnote item 7, PDF p. 2) in TJ Goiás. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Contrarrazões cited a non-existent judgment 'autos nº 5236890-50.2021.8.09.0000'; court concluded it was likely generated by AI and not humanly verified. Outcome: Warning: the Goiás court of appeal found the appellee's citation of a non-existent precedent breaches the duty of procedural loyalty and issued a warning, with a possible bad-faith fine only on repetition; none imposed (headnote item 7, PDF p. 2).
This matter connects fake citations and trial with Warning: the Goiás court of appeal found the appellee's citation of a non-existent precedent breaches the duty of procedural loyalty and issued a warning, with a possible bad-faith fine only on repetition; none imposed (headnote item 7, PDF p. 2) in TJ Goiás. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
Corrected 2026-11-02: see the corrections log.
What the record establishes about AI use
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Warning: the Goiás court of appeal found the appellee's citation of a non-existent precedent breaches the duty of procedural loyalty and issued a warning, with a possible bad-faith fine only on repetition; none imposed (headnote item 7, PDF p. 2)
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Contrarrazões cited a non-existent judgment 'autos nº 5236890-50.2021.8.09.0000'; court concluded it was likely generated by AI and not humanly verified.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Nº 5734510-54.2025.8.09.0051?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Contrarrazões cited a non-existent judgment 'autos nº 5236890-50.2021.8.09.0000'; court concluded it was likely generated by AI and not humanly verified. Outcome: Warning: the Goiás court of appeal found the appellee's citation of a non-existent precedent breaches the duty of procedural loyalty and issued a warning, with a possible bad-faith fine only on repetition; none imposed (headnote item 7, PDF p. 2).
- Why does Nº 5734510-54.2025.8.09.0051 matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects fake citations and trial with Warning: the Goiás court of appeal found the appellee's citation of a non-existent precedent breaches the duty of procedural loyalty and issued a warning, with a possible bad-faith fine only on repetition; none imposed (headnote item 7, PDF p. 2) in TJ Goiás. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about Nº 5734510-54.2025.8.09.0051?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Nº 5734510-54.2025.8.09.0051 summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases
One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.