Peter J. Allsot v. Naseem Latif
M.D. Florida · Jan 20, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- federal
- Court
- M.D. Florida
- Record ID
- peter-j-allsot-v-naseem-latif-2026-01-20
- Observed outcome
- The court overruled the plaintiff's objections, adopted the Magistrate Judge's report, and dismissed the petition without prejudice.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
The court identified a potentially fabricated or incorrect case citation ('M.S. ex rel. S.S. v. Wermers') provided by a pro se litigant. The court dismissed the underlying action without prejudice due to the plaintiff's inability to represent his minor child pro se, but did not issue a specific sanction for the citation error.
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited M.S. ex rel. S.S. v. Wermers, 74 F.3d 857 (8th Cir. 1996); the Court determined the citation appears incorrect or that the case does not exist.
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in M.D. Florida, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Civil Rights
- Trial
- None Adjudicated
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- The District Court reviewed a Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation following the plaintiff's filing of objections, ultimately adopting the report and dismissing the case.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.