Processo nº 986/23.7GAFAF.G1
TR Guimarães · Feb 10, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- international
- Court
- TR Guimarães
- Record ID
- processo-no-986-23-7gafaf-g1-2026-02-10
- Observed outcome
- The appeal was dismissed (improcedente). The original conviction and fine of 1,200 EUR were upheld, and the forfeiture of weapons was confirmed.
- Known monetary consequence
- €1,200
Why this matter warrants attention
The court dismissed the appeal, affirming the conviction for illegal weapon possession. It explicitly rejected the counsel's reliance on six non-existent court rulings, characterizing the behavior as an unacceptable failure of professional diligence, and noted that such conduct undermines the administration of justice.
Fabricated: Case Law | Recorrente identificou e transcreveu excertos de um acórdão de Tribunal Superior que o Tribunal apurou não existir. || Fabricated: Case Law | Recorrente citou outro acórdão supostamente de Tribunal das Relações/Supremo que não consta nas fontes indicadas. || Fabricated: Case Law | Transcrição de excerto atribuída a acórdão superior que o Tribunal verificou ser inexistente no sistema Citius. || Fabricated: Case Law | Apresentação de acórdão supostamente publicado em fonte indicada pelo recorrente, mas não localizado em qualquer fonte. || Fabricated: Case Law | Citação de acórdão com número que nunca correu termos no Tribunal da Relação de Guimarães, apurada como inexistente. || Fabricated: Case Law | Sexto acórdão alegado e transcrito pelo recorrente igualmente não encontrado nas bases ou no sistema Citius.
This record documents a Lawyer filing issue in TR Guimarães, with the listed outcome: Adverse Costs Order; Bar Referral.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fake Citations
- Bar Referral
- Criminal
- Trial
- Monetary
- Professional
- AI attribution
- Implied
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- €1,200
- Procedural posture
- Appellate review of a criminal conviction for illegal weapon possession (detenção de arma proibida) originating from the Juízo Local Criminal de Fafe.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The court explicitly references 'inteligência artificial' in the context of the hallucinated citations.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.
- Escalate and correct a suspect filing promptly, with a documented response.