Public trackerCorpus refreshed Aug 17, 2026 · Latest decision Aug 13, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesFranciely da Silva Luz
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

Franciely da Silva Luz

TJ Parana · Jun 9, 2026

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Advocate attributed a non-existent appellate decision ApCrim 0003535-86.2019.8.16.0013 to Desembargador Paulo Roberto Vasconcelos; court found citation fabricated. Outcome: Bar Referral.

Why the court cared
The structured public record identifies fake citations and bar referral and records Bar Referral. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now
This matter connects fake citations and bar referral with Bar Referral in TJ Parana. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Advocate attributed a non-existent appellate decision ApCrim 0003535-86.2019.8.16.0013 to Desembargador Paulo Roberto Vasconcelos; court found citation fabricated. Outcome: Bar Referral.

Operational lesson

This matter connects fake citations and bar referral with Bar Referral in TJ Parana. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

CourtTJ Parana
Jurisdictioninternational
CircuitNot recorded
DateJun 9, 2026
UN
AI toolUnidentified
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeBar Referral
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

Bar Referral

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Fabricated: Case Law | Advocate attributed a non-existent appellate decision ApCrim 0003535-86.2019.8.16.0013 to Desembargador Paulo Roberto Vasconcelos; court found citation fabricated.
  2. Fabricated: Case Law | Advocate attributed a non-existent appellate decision ApCrim 0001586-93.2019.8.16.0045 to Desembargador José Carlos Dalacqua; court found citation fabricated.
  3. Fabricated: Case Law | Advocate attributed a non-existent appellate decision ApCrim 0013747-31.2018.8.16.0030 to Desembargador Luís Carlos Xavier; court found citation fabricated.
  4. Fabricated: Case Law | Advocate cited HC 487.221/RS attributed to Ministro Nefi Cordeiro which the court identified as a fabricated jurisprudence.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Franciely da Silva Luz?
Fabricated: Case Law | Advocate attributed a non-existent appellate decision ApCrim 0003535-86.2019.8.16.0013 to Desembargador Paulo Roberto Vasconcelos; court found citation fabricated. Outcome: Bar Referral.
Why does Franciely da Silva Luz matter for legal AI risk?
This matter connects fake citations and bar referral with Bar Referral in TJ Parana. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Franciely da Silva Luz?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Franciely da Silva Luz summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.