Back to case record
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
CASE BRIEF / REVIEW PACKETAV-CB-1IJ4M5IGenerated October 4, 2026Evidence checked Oct 4, 2026
TRACKED PUBLIC MATTER

R. M. v. Mohr

CA Oregon · Sep 23, 2026

Jurisdiction
state
Court
CA Oregon
Record ID
r-m-v-mohr-2026-09-23
Observed outcome
Monetary Sanction
Known monetary consequence
$250
ADVISOR READOUT

Why this matter warrants attention

Fabricated: Case Law | The respondent cited three fabricated cases in his opening brief. The court did not identify the individual case names or citations in the decision, disregarded them and their purported support, and imposed a reduced sanction. Outcome: Monetary Sanction.

Why the decision-maker cared

The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records Monetary Sanction. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.

Why it matters now

This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Monetary Sanction in CA Oregon. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

RECORDED ISSUES

Failure modes and consequences

  • Pro Se
  • Fake Citations
  • Family
  • Appellate
  • Monetary
AI attribution
Not Established
Recorded tool
Unidentified
Known monetary consequence
$250
Procedural posture
Monetary Sanction
PRIMARY SOURCE

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open underlying source

A recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

What this record does—and does not—establish

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

PRACTICAL REVIEW IMPLICATIONS

Controls suggested by the public record

  1. Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
  2. Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.