HomeCasesKelly Bartholomew v. Public Utility Commission of Oregon

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Kelly Bartholomew v. Public Utility Commission of Oregon

CA Oregon · Apr 6, 2026

OR / stateEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsadministrativeappellate

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Fabricated cases were used to support multiple incorrect legal propositions and each of petitioner's three assignments of error relied on fabricated authority. Outcome: Judicial review dismissed due to submission of fabricated case citations.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Judicial review dismissed due to submission of fabricated case citations; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving Unidentified with Judicial review dismissed due to submission of fabricated case citations in CA Oregon, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving Unidentified with Judicial review dismissed due to submission of fabricated case citations in CA Oregon, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

OregonSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtCA Oregon

Jurisdictionstate

Circuit9th Circuit

DateApr 6, 2026

AI toolUnidentified

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeJudicial review dismissed due to submission of fabricated case citations

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

Judicial review dismissed due to submission of fabricated case citations

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Fabricated cases were used to support multiple incorrect legal propositions and each of petitioner's three assignments of error relied on fabricated authority.
Fabricated: Case Law | Opening brief included at least 10 fabricated case citations identified by PUC; the court found fabricated legal authority permeated the brief.
Fabricated: Case Law | Specific fabricated citation cited in the brief: 'McKay Creek Valley Ass’n v. Washington County, 309 Or App 112, 124-25, 482 P3d 827 (2021)'; petitioner later claimed she intended a different, real McKay Creek Valley case.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Kelly Bartholomew v. Public Utility Commission of Oregon?: Fabricated: Case Law | Fabricated cases were used to support multiple incorrect legal propositions and each of petitioner's three assignments of error relied on fabricated authority. Outcome: Judicial review dismissed due to submission of fabricated case citations.
Why does Kelly Bartholomew v. Public Utility Commission of Oregon matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving Unidentified with Judicial review dismissed due to submission of fabricated case citations in CA Oregon, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Kelly Bartholomew v. Public Utility Commission of Oregon?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Kelly Bartholomew v. Public Utility Commission of Oregon summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Keith Powell v. Employment Dep. & First Congregational Church of PortlandCA Oregon · Feb 11, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations State v. DixonCA Oregon · Jul 15, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Boersma v. DavenportCA Oregon · May 6, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Carol L. Williams v. Tracy HonlCA Oregon · Apr 22, 2026same court · fake citations + appellate Doiban v. Oregon Liquor and Cannabis CommissionCA Oregon · Mar 18, 2026same court · fake citations + appellate Ringo v. Colquhoun Design Studio, LLCCA Oregon · Dec 3, 2025same court · fake citations + appellate

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Record details

OregonSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtCA Oregon

Jurisdictionstate

Circuit9th Circuit

DateApr 6, 2026

AI toolUnidentified

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeJudicial review dismissed due to submission of fabricated case citations

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Fabricated cases were used to support multiple incorrect legal propositions and each of petitioner's three assignments of error relied on fabricated authority.

Fabricated: Case Law | Opening brief included at least 10 fabricated case citations identified by PUC; the court found fabricated legal authority permeated the brief.

Fabricated: Case Law | Specific fabricated citation cited in the brief: 'McKay Creek Valley Ass’n v. Washington County, 309 Or App 112, 124-25, 482 P3d 827 (2021)'; petitioner later claimed she intended a different, real McKay Creek Valley case.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Kelly Bartholomew v. Public Utility Commission of Oregon?

Why does Kelly Bartholomew v. Public Utility Commission of Oregon matter for legal AI risk?

What does the public record establish about Kelly Bartholomew v. Public Utility Commission of Oregon?

Which source supports this Kelly Bartholomew v. Public Utility Commission of Oregon summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.