Back to case record
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
CASE BRIEF / REVIEW PACKETAV-CB-18KIFMZGenerated October 21, 2026Evidence checked Oct 20, 2026
TRACKED PUBLIC MATTER

Resolución Nº 00152-2026, Expediente 19-000531-0275-PE

CA San José · Jan 29, 2026

Jurisdiction
international
Court
CA San José
Record ID
resolucion-no-00152-2026-expediente-19-000531-0275-pe-2026-01-29
Observed outcome
Warning
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
ADVISOR READOUT

Why this matter warrants attention

Misrepresented: Legal Norm | The brief cited article 36 of the Costa Rican Code of Criminal Procedure as authority for assessing changes in a child victim's account, but the court stated that article 36 regulates conciliation. Outcome: Warning.

Why the decision-maker cared

The structured public record identifies misrepresented authority and criminal and records Warning. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.

Why it matters now

This matter connects misrepresented authority and criminal with Warning in CA San José. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

RECORDED ISSUES

Failure modes and consequences

  • Misrepresented Authority
  • Criminal
  • Appellate
  • Warning
AI attribution
Reported
Recorded tool
ChatGPT
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
Procedural posture
Warning
PRIMARY SOURCE

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open underlying source

A recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

What this record does—and does not—establish

ChatGPT is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

PRACTICAL REVIEW IMPLICATIONS

Controls suggested by the public record

  1. Confirm that each authority supports the stated proposition and has not been mischaracterized.
  2. Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.