AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK
AI visibilityConsultingSearch free
Public trackerCorpus refreshed Oct 23, 2026 · Latest decision Oct 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesYuliana Padilla González v. Sergio Alejandro Vargas Vargas
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

Yuliana Padilla González v. Sergio Alejandro Vargas Vargas

Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0), which credits Edward Cortes García; document hosted in his archive: open the upstream document. What AI Vortex adds.

CA San José · Jun 29, 2026

Costa RicaEditorial impact: lowfake citationstortappellateWarning
Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Outdated Advice: Repealed Law | The appeal relied on Article 221 of the former Code of Civil Procedure, Law 7130, even though that provision had been repealed. The court identified this as use of outdated legislation consistent with unverified AI-assisted drafting. Outcome: Warning.

Why the court cared
The structured public record identifies fake citations and tort and records Warning. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now
This matter connects fake citations and tort with Warning in CA San José. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Outdated Advice: Repealed Law | The appeal relied on Article 221 of the former Code of Civil Procedure, Law 7130, even though that provision had been repealed. The court identified this as use of outdated legislation consistent with unverified AI-assisted drafting. Outcome: Warning.

Operational lesson

This matter connects fake citations and tort with Warning in CA San José. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

CourtCA San José
Jurisdictioninternational
CircuitNot recorded
DateJun 29, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeWarning
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Warning

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Outdated Advice: Repealed Law | The appeal relied on Article 221 of the former Code of Civil Procedure, Law 7130, even though that provision had been repealed. The court identified this as use of outdated legislation consistent with unverified AI-assisted drafting.
  2. Fabricated: Case Law | The appeal cited decision No. 421-F-2018 as authority, but the court stated that the cited numbers did not correspond to the content attributed to them and identified the citation as an unverified irregularity.
  3. Fabricated: Case Law | The appeal cited decision No. 1012-2019 as authority, but the court stated that decisions with the cited numbers allegedly issued by that appellate tribunal did not exist.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Yuliana Padilla González v. Sergio Alejandro Vargas Vargas?
Outdated Advice: Repealed Law | The appeal relied on Article 221 of the former Code of Civil Procedure, Law 7130, even though that provision had been repealed. The court identified this as use of outdated legislation consistent with unverified AI-assisted drafting. Outcome: Warning.
Why does Yuliana Padilla González v. Sergio Alejandro Vargas Vargas matter for legal AI risk?
This matter connects fake citations and tort with Warning in CA San José. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Yuliana Padilla González v. Sergio Alejandro Vargas Vargas?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Yuliana Padilla González v. Sergio Alejandro Vargas Vargas summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Deen v. VMK, Inc.CA California (6d) · Oct 13, 2026fake citations + tort · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Sani v. Institute for Human ReproductionCA Illinois · Aug 18, 2026fake citations + tort · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Garciduenas v. Matrix New World Engineering, Inc.CA Arizona (1d) · Jul 23, 2026fake citations + tort · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Rose Lannquist Gouldy v. Timothy M. Chiasson, et al.CA Florida (4d) · Jul 22, 2026fake citations + tort · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Corrales v BPG InspectionCA Colorado · Jul 2, 2026fake citations + tort · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Matthew Merz v. Harlyn Jenkins, Jillane Baros, Melinda Finn‑KamerathCA Washington · Jun 15, 2026fake citations + tort · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)
Weekly alert

Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases

One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.