Which source supports this Resolución Nº 00152-2026, Expediente 19-000531-0275-PE summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

HomeCasesResolución Nº 00152-2026, Expediente 19-000531-0275-PE

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 90/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.

Corpus matter record

Resolución Nº 00152-2026, Expediente 19-000531-0275-PE

Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0), which credits Edward Cortes García; document hosted in his archive: open the upstream document. What AI Vortex adds.

CA San José · Jan 29, 2026

Costa Rica Editorial impact: low misrepresented authority criminal appellate Warning

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Misrepresented: Legal Norm | The brief cited article 36 of the Costa Rican Code of Criminal Procedure as authority for assessing changes in a child victim's account, but the court stated that article 36 regulates conciliation. Outcome: Warning.

Why the court cared: The structured public record identifies misrepresented authority and criminal and records Warning. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now: This matter connects misrepresented authority and criminal with Warning in CA San José. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This matter connects misrepresented authority and criminal with Warning in CA San José. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

CourtCA San José

Jurisdictioninternational

CircuitNot recorded

DateJan 29, 2026

AI toolChatGPT

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeWarning

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

ChatGPT is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Warning

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Misrepresented: Legal Norm | The brief cited article 36 of the Costa Rican Code of Criminal Procedure as authority for assessing changes in a child victim's account, but the court stated that article 36 regulates conciliation.
Misrepresented: Legal Norm | The brief cited article 175 of the Code of Criminal Procedure as the legal basis for principles of internal coherence, external coherence, and persistence of testimony. The court stated that those principles are not expressed in that provision or in Costa Rican legislation using those terms; article 175 concerns defective procedural acts.
Misrepresented: Legal Norm | The brief cited article 8 of the Code of Criminal Procedure as governing correlation between procedural documents. The court stated that article 8 concerns decisions by collegiate tribunals, not procedural correlation.
Misrepresented: Legal Norm | The brief invoked article 50 of the Code on Children and Adolescents to challenge the proportionality of the sentence. The court stated that this provision has no relation to sentencing proportionality.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Resolución Nº 00152-2026, Expediente 19-000531-0275-PE?: Misrepresented: Legal Norm | The brief cited article 36 of the Costa Rican Code of Criminal Procedure as authority for assessing changes in a child victim's account, but the court stated that article 36 regulates conciliation. Outcome: Warning.
Why does Resolución Nº 00152-2026, Expediente 19-000531-0275-PE matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects misrepresented authority and criminal with Warning in CA San José. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Resolución Nº 00152-2026, Expediente 19-000531-0275-PE?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Resolución Nº 00152-2026, Expediente 19-000531-0275-PE summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Ex parte Bradley ThomasCA Texas · Sep 24, 2026misrepresented authority + criminal State v. DavisCA Ohio · Aug 3, 2026misrepresented authority + criminal Kevin Dale Higgins v. The State of TexasCA Texas · Jul 31, 2026misrepresented authority + criminal State v. DixonCA Oregon · Jul 15, 2026misrepresented authority + criminal State of Missouri v. Timothy H. MooreCA Missouri · Jun 30, 2026misrepresented authority + criminal City of Shaker Heights v. Andre D. ThompsonCA Ohio (8d) · May 21, 2026misrepresented authority + criminal

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source Suggest a correction to this record

Public-record statuspublic record, not an allegation-only entry

Indexing eligibilitypublicly indexable with evidence status disclosed

Published and maintained byManu Ayala · AI VortexIndependent legal AI risk intelligence

Corpus snapshot checked Oct 20, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Oct 20, 2026; latest tracked decision Oct 15, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Open CA San José profile Explore jurisdiction

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Weekly alert

Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases

One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.