Rose Lannquist Gouldy v. Timothy M. Chiasson, et al.
CA Florida (4d) · Jul 22, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- state
- Court
- CA Florida (4d)
- Record ID
- rose-lannquist-gouldy-v-timothy-m-chiasson-et-al-2026-07-22
- Observed outcome
- Order to show cause to consider barring the pro se litigant from future filings
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
Fabricated: Case Law | Cited a nonexistent case as authority: 'Barton v. McGovern, 302 So. 3d 1042 (Fla. 2d DCA 2020)'. Court identified the citation as phantom. Outcome: Order to show cause to consider barring the pro se litigant from future filings.
The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records Order to show cause to consider barring the pro se litigant from future filings. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Order to show cause to consider barring the pro se litigant from future filings in CA Florida (4d). It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Fabricated Quotes
- Tort
- Appellate
- Ordered To Show Cause
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Order to show cause to consider barring the pro se litigant from future filings
reason.com
Secondary or other linked source. The recorded link is not classified as an official court source or docket mirror.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded link is a secondary public source and should be checked against the docket where available. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
- Compare every quoted passage and pincite directly with the underlying opinion or filing.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.