Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Innocent v. Meraki Installers, LLC
CA Florida (4d) · May 27, 2026
FL / stateEditorial impact: highfake citationsfabricated quotesbar referralcontract
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Exhibits & Submissions | Appellant's brief contained multiple purported trial-transcript quotations that are not found in the record; court identified them as fabricated and referred the matter to the Florida Bar. Outcome: Bar Referral.
- Why the court cared
- The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Bar Referral; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Bar Referral in CA Florida (4d), making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Exhibits & Submissions | Appellant's brief contained multiple purported trial-transcript quotations that are not found in the record; court identified them as fabricated and referred the matter to the Florida Bar. Outcome: Bar Referral.
Operational lesson
This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Bar Referral in CA Florida (4d), making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
FloridaSingle-state evidence scope
CourtCA Florida (4d)
Jurisdictionstate
Circuit11th Circuit
DateMay 27, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeBar Referral
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Bar Referral
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Exhibits & Submissions | Appellant's brief contained multiple purported trial-transcript quotations that are not found in the record; court identified them as fabricated and referred the matter to the Florida Bar.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Innocent v. Meraki Installers, LLC?
- Fabricated: Exhibits & Submissions | Appellant's brief contained multiple purported trial-transcript quotations that are not found in the record; court identified them as fabricated and referred the matter to the Florida Bar. Outcome: Bar Referral.
- Why does Innocent v. Meraki Installers, LLC matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Bar Referral in CA Florida (4d), making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about Innocent v. Meraki Installers, LLC?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Innocent v. Meraki Installers, LLC summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.