Seifert v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC, et al.
D. Idaho · Feb 12, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- federal
- Court
- D. Idaho
- Record ID
- seifert-v-nationstar-mortgage-llc-et-al-2026-02-12
- Observed outcome
- The court granted the defendants' motions to dismiss the complaint without prejudice, with leave to amend within 30 days.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
The court dismissed the plaintiff's complaint without prejudice due to procedural defaults and substantive deficiencies, including the use of hallucinated case citations. The judge explicitly ordered the pro se plaintiff to verify that all future legal citations are accurate and exist in a recognized legal database.
Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited "McGinnis v. GMAC Mortg. Corp., 2013 WL 1282124 (D. Colo.)"; court found 2013 WL 1282124 is an appellate brief from Washington and not that case, and noted the real McGinnis decision appears at 2010 WL 3418204 (D. Utah Aug. 27, 2010).
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Idaho, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Misrepresented Authority
- Contract
- Trial
- None Adjudicated
- AI attribution
- Not Established
- Recorded tool
- No tool named in source
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- The court granted the defendants' motions to dismiss the complaint without prejudice, allowing the plaintiff 30 days to file an amended complaint.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Confirm that every authority actually supports the proposition for which it is offered.