HomeCasesSeifert v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC, et al.

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 80/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Seifert v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC, et al.

D. Idaho · Feb 12, 2026

ID / federalEditorial impact: lowpro semisrepresented authoritycontracttrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited "McGinnis v. GMAC Mortg. Corp., 2013 WL 1282124 (D. Colo.)"; court found 2013 WL 1282124 is an appellate brief from Washington and not that case, and noted the real McGinnis decision appears at 2010 WL 3418204 (D. Utah Aug. 27, 2010).

Why the court cared: Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited "McGinnis v. GMAC Mortg. Corp., 2013 WL 1282124 (D. Colo.)"; court found 2013 WL 1282124 is an appellate brief from Washington and not that case, and noted the real McGinnis decision appears at 2010 WL 3418204 (D. Utah Aug. 27, 2010).
Why it matters now: This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Idaho, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Idaho, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.

Record details

IdahoSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtD. Idaho

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit9th Circuit

DateFeb 12, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeSee source

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited "McGinnis v. GMAC Mortg. Corp., 2013 WL 1282124 (D. Colo.)"; court found 2013 WL 1282124 is an appellate brief from Washington and not that case, and noted the real McGinnis decision appears at 2010 WL 3418204 (D. Utah Aug. 27, 2010).

Questions this record answers

What happened in Seifert v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC, et al.?: Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited "McGinnis v. GMAC Mortg. Corp., 2013 WL 1282124 (D. Colo.)"; court found 2013 WL 1282124 is an appellate brief from Washington and not that case, and noted the real McGinnis decision appears at 2010 WL 3418204 (D. Utah Aug. 27, 2010).
Why does Seifert v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC, et al. matter for legal AI risk?: This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Idaho, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.
What does the public record establish about Seifert v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC, et al.?: Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this Seifert v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC, et al. summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Allen v. Experian Information SolutionsD. Idaho · Jan 4, 2026same court · pro se + misrepresented authority Chenco v. Do-FluorideD. Idaho · Aug 22, 2025same court · misrepresented authority + contract BFG Corporation v. Pierce RE Holdings et al.N.D. Illinois · Jun 30, 2026pro se + misrepresented authority · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)CIBC Mortgages Inc v Reina FloresManitoba C.A. · Jun 12, 2026pro se + misrepresented authority · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Allison v. Shutterfly LifeTouch LLCN.D. Illinois · Jun 8, 2026pro se + misrepresented authority · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Wong v. WestendorfBCCRT · Jun 8, 2026pro se + misrepresented authority · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Idaho, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.

Record details

IdahoSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtD. Idaho

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit9th Circuit

DateFeb 12, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeSee source

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Seifert v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC, et al.?

Why does Seifert v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC, et al. matter for legal AI risk?

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Idaho, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.

What does the public record establish about Seifert v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC, et al.?

Which source supports this Seifert v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC, et al. summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.