Shannon Mosher v. Royal Canadian Mounted Police
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal · Sep 23, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- International
- Court
- Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
- Record ID
- shannon-mosher-v-royal-canadian-mounted-police-2026-09-23
- Observed outcome
- The Tribunal found that Luong v. Treasury Board (Canada), 2022 CHRT 21 did not exist and ordered the self-represented complainant to ensure the accuracy of future submissions.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
Fabricated: Case Law | The Tribunal found that no decision titled Luong v. Treasury Board (Canada) existed on CanLII or the Tribunal’s website; the cited neutral citation led to a different decision. Outcome: The Tribunal found that Luong v. Treasury Board (Canada), 2022 CHRT 21 did not exist and ordered the self-represented complainant to ensure the accuracy of future submissions.. Mr. Mosher submitted five legal citations that the RCMP could not locate. The Tribunal specifically examined Luong v. Treasury Board (Canada), 2022 CHRT 21, found no decision of that name on CanLII or the Tribunal’s website, and determined that the neutral citation led to a different decision. The Tribunal concluded that the case did not exist, warned that inaccurate citations delay proceedings and affect their integrity, and ordered Mr. Mosher to ensure the accuracy of future submissions. No monetary or professional sanction was imposed.
The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records The Tribunal found that Luong v. Treasury Board (Canada), 2022 CHRT 21 did not exist and ordered the self-represented complainant to ensure the accuracy of future submissions.. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with The Tribunal found that Luong v. Treasury Board (Canada), 2022 CHRT 21 did not exist and ordered the self-represented complainant to ensure the accuracy of future submissions. in Canadian Human Rights Tribunal. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Trial
- None Adjudicated
- AI attribution
- Not Established
- Recorded tool
- No tool named in source
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- The Tribunal found that Luong v. Treasury Board (Canada), 2022 CHRT 21 did not exist and ordered the self-represented complainant to ensure the accuracy of future submissions.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.